Property Rights

ORS 105.156
Form of writ of execution for judgment of restitution


The writ of execution of judgment of restitution referred to in ORS 105.151 (Enforcement of judgment of restitution) must be in substantially the following form:

State of Oregon, ) WRIT OF
) ss. EXECUTION OF
) JUDGMENT OF
) RESTITUTION
County of_____ )
To the Sheriff:
This was an eviction action for possession of the following premises:
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
Judgment was entered that the plaintiff have restitution of the premises and that the plaintiff may be entitled to court costs and disbursements.
In the name of the State of Oregon, you are ordered to enforce and serve this writ on the defendant, in the manner provided in ORS 105.161 (Service and enforcement of writ of execution and eviction trespass notice).
You are ordered to enter the premises and remove the defendant and any other individual present on the premises who is subject to the judgment and return possession of the premises to the plaintiff. You may use all reasonable force that may be necessary to enter the premises and remove individuals who are subject to the judgment.
The plaintiff shall be responsible for removing, storing and disposing of any personal property left by the defendant on the premises following the removal of the defendant and the return of possession of the premises, as provided by ORS 105.165 (Alternative method of removing, storing and disposing of tenant’s personal property).
DATED this ___ day of______,___.
__________________
Deputy Court Administrator
__________________
Plaintiff
__________________
Address
__________________
City/State/Zip

[2001 c.596 §17 (105.151 (Enforcement of judgment of restitution), 105.152 (Form of notice of restitution for judgment entered under ORS 105.146), 105.153 (Form of notice of restitution for judgment not entered under ORS 105.146), 105.156 (Form of writ of execution for judgment of restitution), 105.157 (Form of eviction trespass notice), 105.158 (Service of notice of restitution), 105.159 (Computation of time before plaintiff may request writ of execution) and 105.161 (Service and enforcement of writ of execution and eviction trespass notice) enacted in lieu of 105.154); 2003 c.378 §29; 2005 c.391 §37; 2007 c.255 §4]
§§ 105.125 to 105.160

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Conditions under which an attorney may appear, (1976) Vol 38, p 184

Law Review Citations

16 WLR 271 (1979)

§§ 105.105 to 105.165

Notes of Decisions

Provisions for early trial, posting of security for accruing rent during continuance and restriction of triable issues do not violate Due Process or Equal Protection clauses of federal constitution. Lindsey v. Normet, 405 US 56, 92 S Ct 862, 31 L Ed 36 (1972)

Proceedings under the Oregon forcible entry and detainer law, including proceedings against nonresident defendants, are not subject to the general statutes relating to service of process. Lexton-Ancira, Inc. v. Kay, 269 Or 1, 522 P2d 875 (1974)

A forcible entry and detainer proceeding is a "local action" for choice of law purposes. Fry v. D.H. Overmyer Co., 269 Or 281, 525 P2d 140 (1974)

the Defendant Did not State Good Affirmative Defenses By Alleging

a violation of public policy forbidding a franchisor to refuse to renew a franchise except for good cause; A "retaliatory eviction" for a refusal to engage in improper business practices; and an implied agreement to renew based upon conduct and prior dealings. William C. Cornitius, Inc., v. Wheeler, 276 Or 747, 556 P2d 666 (1976)

In forcible entry and detainer action to recover possession of commercial property, claim for attorney fees could not be litigated. Grove v. The Hindquarter Corp., 45 Or App 781, 609 P2d 840 (1980)

In forcible entry and detainer action for possession of commercial premises, landlords could not recover attorney fees. Owen J. Jones & Son, Inc. v. Gospodinovic, 46 Or App 101, 610 P2d 1238 (1980)

Equitable defense may be raised in FED proceeding. Rose v. Webster, 51 Or App 293, 625 P2d 1329 (1981)

In FED action to recover commercial property, defendant cannot assert counterclaim unless counterclaim is authorized by statute. Class v. Carter, 293 Or 147, 645 P2d 536 (1982)

Law Review Citations

16 WLR 291 (1979)

Chapter 105

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Private process server in a forcible entry and detainer action, (1975) Vol 37, p 869


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021