Conditions of parole
Source:
Section 144.270 — Conditions of parole, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors144.html
.
Notes of Decisions
The parole-granting process continues until the inmate is actually released from confinement so that an order of the board canceling its previous order of parole did not constitute a revocation of parole where the order of cancellation preceded and prevented the actual release of the inmate and thereby brought the parole-granting process to a halt. Bailleaux v. Cupp, 16 Or App 573, 520 P2d 483 (1974), Sup Ct review denied
The board does not abuse its discretion under this section by requiring an inmate to waive extradition as a condition of his release on parole where a detainer has been filed by another state. Bailleaux v. Cupp, 16 Or App 573, 520 P2d 483 (1974), Sup Ct review denied
The Board of Parole did not act illegally in imposing upon the prisoner a condition that he sign a waiver of extradition before being granted parole to authorities of another state. Bailleaux v. Cupp, 535 F2d 543 (1976)
Where knife was stored in location where person would logically store knife intended to be used against other persons, knife was “weapon.” Brundridge v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 192 Or App 648, 87 P3d 703 (2004), Sup Ct review denied
Person does not “frequent” place by going to place one time. Brundridge v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 192 Or App 648, 87 P3d 703 (2004), Sup Ct review denied
Where prisoner is sentenced for some offenses subject to parole and some offenses subject to post-prison supervision, upon release, prisoner may be made subject to both parole and post-prison supervision. Kowalski v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 194 Or App 156, 93 P3d 831 (2004), Sup Ct review denied