Persons With Mental Illness

ORS 426.060
Commitment to Oregon Health Authority

  • powers of authority
  • placement
  • transfer


(1)

Commitments to the Oregon Health Authority shall be made only by the judge of a circuit court in a county of this state.

(2)

The following is a nonexclusive list of powers the authority may exercise concerning the placement of persons committed or persons receiving emergency care and treatment under ORS 426.070 (Initiation), 426.228 (Custody) to 426.235 (Transfer between hospital and nonhospital facilities) or 426.237 (Prehearing detention):

(a)

In its discretion and for reasons which are satisfactory to the authority, the authority may direct any court-committed person to the facility best able to treat the person. The decision of the authority on such matters shall be final.

(b)

At any time, for good cause and in the best interest of the person with mental illness, the authority may transfer a committed person from one facility to another. When transferring a person under this paragraph, the authority shall make the transfer:

(A)

If the transfer is from a facility in one class to a facility of the same class, as provided by rule of the authority;

(B)

If the transfer is from a facility in one class to a facility in a less restrictive class, by following the procedures for trial visits under ORS 426.273 (Trial visits); and

(C)

If the transfer is from a facility in one class to a facility in a more restrictive class, by following the procedures under ORS 426.275 (Effect of failure to adhere to condition of placement).

(c)

At any time, for good cause and in the best interest of the person with mental illness, the authority may transfer a person receiving emergency care and treatment under ORS 426.070 (Initiation) or 426.228 (Custody) to 426.235 (Transfer between hospital and nonhospital facilities), or intensive treatment under ORS 426.237 (Prehearing detention), between hospitals and nonhospital facilities approved by the authority to provide emergency care or treatment as defined by rule of the authority.

(d)

Pursuant to its rules, the authority may delegate to a community mental health program director the responsibility for assignment of persons with mental illness to suitable facilities or transfer between such facilities under conditions which the authority may define. [Amended by 1955 c.651 §6; 1963 c.254 §1; 1967 c.534 §19; 1973 c.838 §2; 1975 c.690 §1; 1987 c.903 §6; 1993 c.484 §12; 2009 c.595 §384; 2013 c.360 §17]
§§ 426.005 to 426.395

Notes of Decisions

The doctor-patient privilege applies under these sections. State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976)

Prior to commitment there must be evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual is mentally ill as defined. State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976)

The Oregon commitment statutes are not unconstitutional on the grounds of vagueness or as an invasion of privacy as protected by the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976)

Oregon Constitution did not require jury in mental commitment hearings. State v. Mills, 36 Or App 727, 585 P2d 1143 (1978), Sup Ct review denied

Alleged mentally ill person does not have right to remain silent in civil commitment proceeding. State v. Matthews, 46 Or App 757, 613 P2d 88 (1980), Sup Ct review denied

Law Review Citations

9 WLJ 63-85 (1973)

Chapter 426

Notes of Decisions

The entire statutory scheme of involuntary commitment provides adequate procedural safeguards which satisfies the requirements of due process and equal protection. Dietrich v. Brooks, 27 Or App 821, 558 P2d 357 (1976), Sup Ct review denied

Atty. Gen. Opinions

County of residence paying mental commitment costs, (1979) Vol 40, p 147; civil commitment to Mental Health Division of person against whom criminal charges are pending, (1980) Vol 41, p 91

Law Review Citations

16 WLR 448 (1979)


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021