Failure to perform duties of driver when property is damaged
- penalty
Source:
Section 811.700 — Failure to perform duties of driver when property is damaged; penalty, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors811.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Under former similar statute
Criminal charge based on failure of driver involved in accident to leave name and address is not a charge which can be dismissed on basis of civil compromise. State v. Duffy, 33 Or App 301, 576 P2d 797 (1978)
One charged with Class A traffic infraction under this section is entitled to trial by jury and proof beyond reasonable doubt. State v. Riggs, 35 Or App 571, 582 P2d 457 (1978), Sup Ct review denied
“Accident” under this section includes intentional as well as unintentional vehicular collisions. State v. Parker, 70 Or App 397, 689 P2d 1035 (1984), aff’d 299 Or 534, 704 P2d 1144 (1985)
Defendant-parking lot attendant who damaged complainant’s car while parking another and declined to provide information required by this section did not violate section in failing to provide information since he had remained at scene of accident at all times. State v. Martin, 298 Or 264, 691 P2d 908 (1984)
In general
Requirement that driver damaging property take “reasonable steps” to notify property owner is not unconstitutionally vague. State v. Porter, 95 Or App 373, 768 P2d 940 (1989), Sup Ct review denied
Requirement in this section that person involved in accident give name and address to driver of other car does not impose substantial risk of self-incrimination and thus does not violate Article I, section 12 of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Monroe, 101 Or App 379, 790 P2d 1188 (1990)
If defendant actually and reasonably believed compliance with this section was literally impossible, she would not have had required culpable mental states and failure to give requested jury instruction prejudiced defendant. State v. Monroe, 101 Or App 379, 790 P2d 1188 (1990)
Although statute does not require driver of vehicle that damages property to remain at scene and report accident before moving car, court could determine that driver did not intend to report accident, where driver with suspended license and driving under influence damaged fire hydrant and sped away from scene just as police officer arrived. State v. Pruitt, 115 Or App 587, 839 P2d 735 (1992), Sup Ct review denied
“Collides” refers only to collision that results in damage to unattended vehicle. State v. Foote, 154 Or App 227, 960 P2d 900 (1998)
Duties arising from accident that results “only” in damage to vehicle apply to any accident in which vehicle damage occurs, regardless of whether other damage, injury or duty results or arises. State v. Hval, 174 Or App 164, 25 P3d 958 (2001), Sup Ct review denied
Requirement that driver “immediately stop” means to stop “without delay” and, under any measure, two-minute lapse constitutes delay prior to stopping. State v. Cruz-Gonzelez, 256 Or App 811, 303 P3d 983 (2013), Sup Ct review denied
Where defendant driver was involved in collision with vehicle driven by defendant’s friend, after which defendant and friend drove to same location, and defendant did not affirmatively provide information specified by this section to friend at scene of accident before leaving scene, defendant failed to perform duties of driver even though information was available to defendant’s friend. State v. Turudic, 286 Or App 184, 399 P3d 1041 (2017)