Public.Law logo OregonLaws
  • Oregon Administrative Rules
  • Oregon Revised Statutes
  • ORCP
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Search: forfeiture

Publications


Loading...

Search: forfeiture
201 – 208 of 418

OAR 741-030-0070
Department of Transportation, Rail Division
Suspension or Revocation of Preliminary or Final Certification
ORS 30.310
Actions and Suits in Particular Cases
Actions and suits by governmental units
OAR 635-006-0235
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Revocation of and Refusal to Issue Commercial Fishing and Fish Dealer Licenses
ORS 517.815
Mining and Mining Claims
Reclamation bond pooling program
  • requirements
  • rules
ORS 46.405
Small Claims Department of Circuit Court
Small claims department
  • jurisdiction
ORS 106.990
Marriage; Domestic Partnership
Penalties
OAR 330-070-0045
Department of Energy
Enforcement
ORS 743.225
Health and Life Insurance and Annuities
Prohibited provisions
  • « First
  • ‹ Prev
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • …
  • Next ›
  • Last »

Dictionary entries


forfeiture by peaceable re-entry Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
 



Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The Oregon State Bar runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Lawyer Referral Service

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • API
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
  • Privacy Policy
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Florida: Statutes
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location:

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.