Public.Law logo OregonLaws
  • Oregon Administrative Rules
  • Oregon Revised Statutes
  • ORCP
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Search: forfeiture

Publications


Loading...

Search: forfeiture
33 – 40 of 418

ORS 131A.200
Civil Forfeiture
Ex parte forfeiture
ORS 93.920
Conveyancing and Recording
Curing default to avoid forfeiture
  • payment of costs and expenses
ORS 131A.155
Civil Forfeiture
Recorded forfeiture notice
ORS 131A.105
Civil Forfeiture
Decision on seeking forfeiture
OAR 690-017-0600
Water Resources Department
Protest of Cancellation/Statement of Intent to Rebut Presumption of Forfeiture
ORS 323.240
Cigarettes and Tobacco Products
Search warrants
  • seizure and forfeiture
ORS 506.700
Application, Administration and Enforcement of Commercial Fishing Laws
Return of seized property
  • undertaking
  • effect of judgment ordering forfeiture or confiscation
ORS 131A.090
Civil Forfeiture
Forfeiture trust accounts
  • « First
  • ‹ Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • Next ›
  • Last »

Dictionary entries


forfeiture by peaceable re-entry Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
 



Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The Oregon State Bar runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Lawyer Referral Service

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • API
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
  • Privacy Policy
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Florida: Statutes
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location:

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.