OAR 137-001-0009
Use of Collaborative Dispute Resolution in Rulemaking


(1)

If, after consideration of the factors set out in OAR 137-001-0008 (Assessment for Use of Collaborative Process in Rulemaking), the agency establishes a collaborative rulemaking committee, the agency shall inform the committee regarding:

(a)

The membership of the rulemaking committee;

(b)

Whether or not the agency will be a member of the committee;

(c)

A proposed agenda and schedule for completing the work of the committee, including a target date for publication by the agency of any intended rulemaking action pursuant to ORS 183.335 (Notice); and

(d)

Whether or not the rulemaking committee also serves as an advisory committee under ORS 183.333 (Policy statement)(1) and is therefore subject to 183.333 (Policy statement)(3) and (4).

(2)

The agency may inform persons on the agency’s mailing list maintained pursuant to ORS 183.335 (Notice)(8), those legislators designated in ORS 183.335 (Notice)(15) and any other persons of the subject and scope of rulemaking action that may result from the work of the collaborative rulemaking committee.

(3)

The agency may limit membership on a collaborative rulemaking committee to ensure proper functioning of the committee or to achieve balanced membership. If the agency will be a member of the committee, the person or persons representing the agency may participate in the deliberations and activities of the committee with the same status as other members of the committee.

(4)

A collaborative rulemaking committee established under this rule shall consider the matter proposed by the agency and attempt to reach a consensus concerning a proposed rulemaking action with respect to such matter.

(5)

If the collaborative rulemaking committee established under this rule serves as an advisory committee under ORS 183.333 (Policy statement)(1), the committee shall comply with ORS 183.333 (Policy statement)(3) and (4).

(6)

The agency shall explain to the committee the agency’s expectations for using any consensus reached by the committee in any rulemaking action and explain the decision making process within the agency that would be necessary to bind the agency to any consensus reached by the committee.

(7)

The agency may select a facilitator, subject to removal by the committee by consensus. In selecting a facilitator, the agency may consider the convenor or any qualified individual, including an agency employee. If the committee elects to remove the facilitator selected by the agency, the agency may select another facilitator or allow the committee to select a facilitator by consensus. An individual designated to represent the agency in substantive issues may not serve as a facilitator or otherwise chair the committee.

(8)

A facilitator approved or selected by a collaborative rulemaking committee may chair the meetings of the committee, assist the members of the committee in conducting discussions and negotiations, or manage the keeping of minutes and records and such assistance, if any, shall be provided in an impartial manner.

(9)

For purposes of a collaborative rulemaking, both convenors and facilitators are considered dispute resolution providers, except that the agency’s personal services contract for convenors need not contain the elements listed in OAR 137-005-0040 (Selection and Procurement of Dispute Resolution Providers)(6)(b).

(10)

A collaborative rulemaking committee established under this rule may adopt procedures for the operation of the committee. If the committee reaches a consensus on a proposed rulemaking action, the committee shall transmit to the agency a report containing the proposed rulemaking action. If the committee does not reach a consensus on a proposed rulemaking action, the committee may transmit to the agency a report specifying any areas in which the committee did reach a consensus.

(11)

If the agency chooses to proceed with a rulemaking action after receiving the report of the committee, the agency shall comply with the rulemaking procedures in ORS 183.325 (Delegation of rulemaking authority to named officer or employee) to 183.355 (Filing and taking effect of rules).

(12)

The agency may request the committee to reconvene after a notice of proposed rulemaking action required by ORS 183.335 (Notice)(1) in order to consider any public comments received by the agency related to the rule. If the agency wishes to receive input from the committee after the deadline for comment on the proposed rulemaking action, the agency shall extend the comment deadline in order to receive such recommendations from the committee. The agency shall provide notice of the extended deadline to persons on the agency’s mailing list maintained pursuant to 183.335 (Notice)(8), to those legislators designated in 183.335 (Notice)(15) and to persons identified in its notice rule adopted under 183.341 (Model rules of procedure)(4).

(13)

The collaborative rulemaking committee shall terminate upon the agency’s adoption, amendment, or repeal of the final rule under consideration, unless the committee specifies an earlier termination date. The agency may terminate the collaborative rulemaking committee at any time.

(14)

The members of a collaborative rulemaking committee are responsible for their own expenses of participation in the committee. If authorized by law, the agency may pay a member’s reasonable travel and per diem expenses and other expenses as the agency deems appropriate.

Source: Rule 137-001-0009 — Use of Collaborative Dispute Resolution in Rulemaking, https://secure.­sos.­state.­or.­us/oard/view.­action?ruleNumber=137-001-0009.

Last Updated

Jun. 8, 2021

Rule 137-001-0009’s source at or​.us