OAR 137-003-0569
Discovery in Contested Case Hearing — Enforcement
(1)
The administrative law judge may refuse to admit evidence that was not disclosed in response to a discovery order or discovery request, unless the party or agency that failed to provide discovery offers a satisfactory reason for having failed to do so, or unless excluding the evidence would violate the duty to conduct a full and fair inquiry under ORS 183.417 (Procedure in contested case hearing)(8). If the administrative law judge admits evidence that was not disclosed as ordered or requested, the administrative law judge must, upon request, grant a continuance to allow an opportunity for the agency or other party to respond to the undisclosed evidence. The requirement to grant continuances shall not apply in implied consent proceedings conducted pursuant to ORS chapter 813.(2)
Failure to respond to a request for admissions required by a discovery order shall be deemed an admission of matters that are the subject of the request for admissions, unless the party or agency failing to respond offers a satisfactory reason for having failed to do so, or unless excluding additional evidence on the subject of the request for admissions would violate the duty to conduct a full and fair inquiry under ORS 183.417 (Procedure in contested case hearing)(8). If the administrative law judge does not treat failure to respond to the request for admissions as admissions, the administrative law judge may grant a continuance to enable the parties and the agency to develop the record as needed.(3)
Nothing in OAR chapter 137, division 3, shall be construed to require the agency or any party to provide information that is confidential or privileged under state or federal law, except that upon request the agency or any party must disclose all documents that the agency or party intends to introduce at the hearing.
Source:
Rule 137-003-0569 — Discovery in Contested Case Hearing — Enforcement, https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/view.action?ruleNumber=137-003-0569
.