OAR 150-317-1200
Cost Input or Labor Cost Subtraction

(1) The subtraction provided in ORS 317A.119 (Subtraction) includes all labor costs or cost inputs of a taxpayer, whichever is greater, regardless of the place the labor cost or cost input is incurred, except for cost inputs or labor costs that are attributable to the taxpayer’s receipts from an item that is not commercial activity. For purposes of the subtraction, a unitary group, as determined pursuant to ORS 317A.106 (Unitary groups), must include the labor costs or cost inputs of all members of the unitary group, regardless where incurred, except for expenses from transactions among members of the group as provided in ORS 317A.119 (Subtraction)(2)(a) for which receipts are excluded under ORS 317A.106 (Unitary groups)

(2) Determining Costs Eligible for Subtraction. Costs described in ORS 317A.119 (Subtraction)(2)(a) and (b) (“ineligible costs”) are not eligible for subtraction. “Eligible costs” equals 35 percent of the greater of (A) the excess of total labor costs over the amount of labor costs that are ineligible costs or (B) the excess of total cost inputs over the amount of cost inputs that are ineligible costs.

(a) If a taxpayer can reasonably determine, from the taxpayer’s books and records maintained in the ordinary course of business, how much of its total labor costs or cost inputs are ineligible costs or that it has no ineligible costs, the taxpayer may calculate the subtraction using the appropriate method under section (3), unless otherwise permitted or required under this rule.

(b) A taxpayer who cannot reasonably determine how much of either its total labor costs or cost inputs are ineligible costs based on its books and records may use a reasonable method to approximate eligible costs. The taxpayer must document the approximation method used and retain the documentation in the taxpayer’s records. Documentation must be provided to the department upon request. The department may disallow the approximation method used under this section if it does not reasonably approximate the taxpayer’s eligible costs.

(3) General Rule. Computation of subtraction for eligible costs after reduction of ineligible costs.

(a) If all the taxpayer’s commercial activity is sourced to Oregon, the taxpayer’s subtraction equals its eligible costs.

(b) If the taxpayer has commercial activity both within and without Oregon, the taxpayer must apportion the taxpayer’s eligible costs as follows, unless the taxpayer elects to use the substitute rule under section (4).

(A) If the corporate activity taxpayer is identical to the entity or group of entities reporting on the apportionment schedule filed for purposes of Oregon income or excise tax under ORS chapters 314, 316, 317, or 318, that taxpayer must multiply its eligible costs by the apportionment factor percentage from the taxpayer’s Oregon apportionment schedule filed under ORS chapters 314, 316, 317, or 318 to calculate the subtraction amount. The taxpayer must use the apportionment schedule filed with the most recent return covering a 12-month period filed with the department.

(B) If a corporate activity taxpayer is not identical to the entity or group of entities reporting on the apportionment schedule filed for purposes of Oregon income or excise tax under ORS chapters 314, 316, 317, or 318, the taxpayer must compute its Oregon apportionment factor percentage using the applicable apportionment method under ORS chapters 314 or 317, except as otherwise required or permitted under this rule. The taxpayer must multiply its eligible costs by the computed apportionment factor percentage.

(c) Notwithstanding section (3)(b), unitary group taxpayers with members subject to multiple apportionment methods under ORS chapters 314 or 317 must compute the group’s eligible costs as follows, except as otherwise required or permitted under this rule.

(A) Separate the unitary group into subgroups. Each subgroup consists of members that use the same apportionment method under ORS chapter 314 or 317.

(B) Each subgroup must separately determine eligible costs as required under section (2) of this rule.

(C) Each subgroup must separately compute their apportionment factor using the applicable apportionment method under ORS chapter 314 or 317, except that transactions between all unitary group members must be eliminated, regardless of whether transactions are between or among unitary group members subject to sales factor apportionment under ORS 314.650 (Apportionment of income) or those subject to another apportionment method under ORS chapter 314 or 317.

(D) Each subgroup must multiply its eligible costs, as determined under section (2) of this rule, by the subgroup’s apportionment factor percentage determined under subsection (3)(c)(C).

(E) The unitary group’s subtraction is the sum of the apportioned eligible costs of each subgroup.

(4) Substitute Rule. A taxpayer may, in lieu of calculating and apportioning eligible costs as required in sections (2) and (3) of this rule, elect to approximate and apportion eligible costs by means of the commercial activity ratio.

(a) Costs for commercial activity ratio. A taxpayer’s costs under the commercial activity ratio (“applicable costs”) equal 35 percent of the greater of total cost of goods everywhere or total labor costs everywhere, as those costs are determined before application of ORS 317A.119 (Subtraction)(2)(b). Expenses from transactions among members of a unitary group must be excluded.

(b) Commercial Activity Ratio. The commercial activity ratio is a fraction, the numerator of which is the taxpayer’s commercial activity sourced to Oregon and the denominator of which is the sum of the taxpayer’s total commercial activity everywhere plus amounts excluded under ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(Q), ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(Y), ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(AA), ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(DD), ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(EE), ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(TT), and ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(VV). Receipts from transactions among unitary group members are not included in either the numerator or denominator.

(c) Subtraction. For purposes of the substitute rule, the taxpayer’s subtraction is calculated by multiplying the applicable costs under subsection (a) by the taxpayer’s commercial activity ratio under subsection (b).

(5) Fiscal Year Election. For purposes of this rule, fiscal year means a period of 12 consecutive months ending on the last day of any month other than December or any taxpayer or unitary group that has made an election under IRC § 441 for a fiscal year which varies from 52 to 53 weeks. A taxpayer or unitary group may elect to use the taxpayer’s or unitary group’s most recent fiscal year information for purposes of determining the subtraction under this rule. An election under this section must be made on a timely filed, original return including extensions. An election under this section is binding for and applicable to the tax year in which it is made.

(6) Limitations.

(a) The subtraction may not exceed 95 percent of the taxpayer’s Oregon commercial activity.

(b) Labor costs may not include total compensation paid to a single employee in excess of $500,000.

(c) Expenses from transactions among members of a unitary group with respect to receipts that are excluded under ORS 317A.106 (Unitary groups) and ORS 317A.100 (Definitions)(1)(b)(FF) are not included in the calculation of the subtraction.

(d) A unitary group required to apportion the amount of the subtraction shall include all members of the unitary group for purposes of determining the group’s subtraction amount and apportionment ratio, except that the unitary group may not include members excluded from the unitary group pursuant to an election under ORS 317A.106 (Unitary groups)(2).

(7) Alternative Apportionment. A taxpayer may petition the department for alternative apportionment, or the department may require alternative apportionment if the application of sections (3) to (5) of this rule does not fairly represent the costs of taxpayer’s commercial activity in Oregon.

(a) A petition to use an alternative method of apportionment under section (7) of this rule must be filed in writing with the department. The request must be signed by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative and must be filed separately from the taxpayer’s return. The request must include a complete explanation of the alternative method as well as an explanation why the application of section (3) to (5) should not be used. Upon receipt of the request, the department will review the request and issue a letter either authorizing or denying the request. If denied, the taxpayer can appeal that action as provided in ORS 305.275 (Persons who may appeal due to acts or omissions). An alternative apportionment method may be used only after receiving written authorization from the department. The authorization may be revoked if, upon audit, the department determines that the alternative method does not fairly represent the costs of taxpayer’s commercial activity in Oregon. Once an alternative method has been authorized, that method must be used until a request to change is made and approved by the department or until the authorization is revoked after audit.

(b) Factors considered in approving alternative methods of apportionment include but are not limited to whether a modification:

(A) Will fairly and accurately reflect the taxpayer’s costs attributable to receipts from commercial activity in Oregon; and

(B) Will effectuate an equitable apportionment of the taxpayer’s costs attributable to receipts from commercial activity.

Source: Rule 150-317-1200 — Cost Input or Labor Cost Subtraction, https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/view.action?ruleNumber=150-317-1200.

California:	Codes
Colorado:	C.R.S.
Nevada:	NRS
New York:	Laws
Oregon:	OAR, ORS
Texas:	Statutes
World:	Rome Statute, International Dictionary

OAR 150-317-1200 Cost Input or Labor Cost Subtraction

OAR 150-317-1200
Cost Input or Labor Cost Subtraction