OAR 340-041-0061
Other Implementation of Water Quality Criteria


(1)

A waste treatment and disposal facility may not be constructed or operated and wastes may not be discharged to public waters without a permit from the department in accordance with ORS 468B.050 (Water quality permit).

(2)

Plans for all sewage and industrial waste treatment, control, and disposal facilities must be submitted to the department for review and approval prior to construction as required by ORS 468B.055 (Plans and specifications for disposal, treatment and sewerage systems).

(3)

Minimum design criteria for waste treatment and control facilities prescribed under this plan and other waste treatment and controls deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the water quality standards contained in this plan must be provided in accordance with specific permit conditions for those sources or activities for which permits are required and the following implementation program.

(a)

For new or expanded waste loads or activities, fully approved treatment or control facilities, or both, must be provided prior to discharge of any wastes from the new or expanded facilities or conduct of the new or expanded activity.

(b)

For existing waste loads or activities, additional treatment or control facilities necessary to correct specific unacceptable water quality conditions must be provided in accordance with a specific program and timetable incorporated into the waste discharge permit for the individual discharger or activity. In developing treatment requirements and implementation schedules for existing installations or activities, consideration will be given to the impact upon the overall environmental quality, including air, water, land use, and aesthetics.

(c)

Wherever minimum design criteria for waste treatment and control facilities set forth in this plan are more stringent than applicable federal standards and treatment levels currently being provided, upgrading to the more stringent requirements will be deferred until it is necessary to expand or otherwise modify or replace the existing treatment facilities. Such deferral will be acknowledged in the permit for the source.

(d)

Where planning, design, or construction of new or modified waste treatment and controls to meet prior applicable state or federal requirements is underway at the time this plan is adopted, such plans, design, or construction may be completed under the requirements in effect when the project was initiated. Upgrading to meet more stringent future requirements will be timed in accordance with section (3) of this rule.

(4)

Confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are regulated under OAR 340-051-0005 (Purpose) through 340-051-0080 (Guidelines for the Design and Operation of Animal Waste Control Facilities: Sources of Qualified Assistance for Design of Facilities) to minimize potential adverse effect on water quality (see also OAR 603-074-0005 (Purpose) through 603-074-0070 (Civil Penalty Assessment)).

(5)

Programs for control of pollution from nonpoint sources when developed by the department or by other agencies pursuant to section 208 of the federal Clean Water Act and approved by the department will be incorporated into this plan by amendment via the same process used to adopt the plan unless other procedures are established by law.

(6)

Where minimum requirements of federal law or enforceable regulations are more stringent than specific provisions of this plan, the federal requirements will prevail.

(7)

Within the framework of statewide priorities and available resources, the department will monitor water quality within the basin for the purposes of evaluating conformance with the plan and developing information for additions or updates.

(8)

The commission recognizes that the potential exists for conflicts between water quality management plans and the land use plans and resource management plans that local governments and other agencies are required to develop. If conflicts develop, the department will meet with the local governments or responsible agencies to resolve the conflicts. Revisions will be presented for adoption via the same process used to adopt the plan unless other specific procedures are established by law.

(9)

The department will calculate and include effluent limits specified in pounds per day, which will be the mass load limits for biochemical oxygen demand or carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits issued to all sewage treatment facilities. These limits must be calculated as follows.

(a)

Except as noted in paragraph (H) of this subsection, the following requirements apply to existing facilities and to facilities receiving departmental approval for engineering plans and specifications for new treatment facilities or treatment facilities expanding the average dry weather treatment capacity before June 30, 1992:

(A)

During periods of low stream flows (approximately May 1 through October 31), the monthly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the applicable monthly concentration effluent limit times the design average dry weather flow expressed in million gallons per day times 8.34. The weekly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 1.5. The daily mass load expressed in pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 2.0.

(B)

During the period of high stream flows (approximately November 1 through April 30), the monthly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the monthly concentration effluent limit times the design average wet weather flow expressed in million gallons per day times 8.34. The weekly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 1.5. The daily mass load expressed in pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 2.0.

(C)

On any day that the daily flow to a sewage treatment facility exceeds the lesser hydraulic capacity of the secondary treatment portion of the facility or twice the design average dry weather flow, the daily mass load limit does not apply. The permittee must operate the treatment facility at highest and best practicable treatment and control.

(D)

The design average wet weather flow used in calculating mass loads must be approved by the department in accordance with prudent engineering practice and must be based on a facility plan approved by the department, engineering plans and specifications approved by the department, or an engineering evaluation. The permittee must submit documentation describing and supporting the design average wet weather flow with the permit application, application for permit renewal, or modification request or upon request by the department. The design average wet weather flow is defined as the average flow between November 1 and April 30 when the sewage treatment facility is projected to be at design capacity for that portion of the year.

(E)

Mass loads assigned as described in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this subsection will not be subject to OAR 340-041-0004 (Antidegradation)(9);

(F)

Mass loads as described in this rule will be included in permits upon renewal or upon a request for permit modification.

(G)

Within 180 days after permit renewal or modification, a permittee receiving higher mass loads under this rule and having a separate sanitary sewer system must submit to the department for review and approval a proposed program and time schedule for identifying and reducing inflow. The program must include the following:
(i)
Identification of all overflow points and verification that sewer system overflows are not occurring up to a 24-hour, five-year storm event or equivalent;
(ii)
Monitoring of all pump station overflow points;
(iii)
A program for identifying and removing all inflow sources into the permit holder’s sewer system over which the permit holder has legal control; and
(iv)
For those permit holders not having the necessary legal authority for all portions of the sewer system discharging into the permit holder’s sewer system or treatment facility, a program and schedule for gaining legal authority to require inflow reduction and a program and schedule for removing inflow sources.

(H)

Within one year after the department’s approval of the program, the permit holder must begin implementation of the program.

(I)

Paragraphs (A) through (G) of this subsection do not apply to the cities of Athena, Elgin, Adair Village, Halsey, Harrisburg, Independence, Carlton, and Sweet Home. Mass load limits have been individually assigned to these facilities.

(b)

For new sewage treatment facilities or treatment facilities expanding the average dry weather treatment capacity and receiving engineering plans and specifications approval from the department after June 30, 1992, the mass load limits must be calculated by the department based on the proposed treatment facility capabilities and the highest and best practicable treatment to minimize the discharge of pollutants.

(c)

Mass load limits as defined in this rule may be replaced by more stringent limits if required by waste load allocations established in accordance with a TMDL for treatment facilities discharging to water quality limited streams or if required to prevent or eliminate violations of water quality standards.

(d)

If the design average wet weather flow or the hydraulic secondary treatment capacity is not known or has not been approved by the department at the time of permit issuance, the permit must include as interim mass load limits the mass load limits in the previous permit issued to the permit holder for the treatment facility. The permit must also include a requirement that the permit holder submit to the department the design average wet weather flow and hydraulic secondary treatment capacity within 12 months after permit issuance. Upon review and approval of the design flow information, the department will modify the permit and include mass load limits as described in subsection (a) of this section.

(e)

Each permit holder with existing sewage treatment facilities otherwise subject to subsection (a) of this section may choose mass load limits calculated as follows:

(A)

The monthly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the applicable monthly concentration effluent limit times the design average dry weather flow expressed in million gallons per day times 8.34 pounds per gallon.

(B)

The weekly average mass load expressed as pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 1.5.

(C)

The daily mass load expressed in pounds per day may not exceed the monthly average mass load times 2.0. If existing mass load limits are retained by the permit holder, the terms and requirements of subsection (a) of this section do not apply.

(f)

The commission may grant exceptions to subsection (a) of this section. In allowing increased discharged loads, the commission must make the findings specified in OAR 340-041-0004 (Antidegradation)(9)(a) for waste loads and the following findings:

(A)

Mass loads calculated in subsection (a) of this section cannot be achieved with the existing treatment facilities operated at maximum efficiency at projected design flows; and

(B)

There are no practicable alternatives to achieving the mass loads as calculated in subsection (a) of this section.

(10)

Testing methods. The analytical testing methods for determining compliance with the water quality standards in this rule must comply with 40 CFR Part 136 or, if Part 136 does not prescribe a method, with the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water published jointly by the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation; if the department has published an applicable superseding method, testing must comply with the superseding method. Testing in accordance with an alternative method must comply with this rule if the department has published the method or has approved the method in writing.

(11)

Reservoirs or managed lakes are deemed in compliance with water quality criteria for temperature, pH, or dissolved oxygen (DO) if all of the following circumstances exist.

(a)

The water body has thermally stratified naturally or due to the presence of an impoundment.

(b)

The water body has three observable layers, defined as the epilimnion, metalimnion, and hypolimnion.

(c)

A layer exists in the reservoir or managed lake in which temperature, pH, and DO criteria are all met, and the layer is sufficient to support beneficial uses.

(d)

All practicable measures have been taken by the entities responsible for management of the reservoir or managed lake to maximize the layers meeting the temperature, pH, and DO criteria.

(e)

One of the following conditions is met:

(A)

The streams or river segments immediately downstream of the water body meet applicable criteria for temperature, pH, and DO.

(B)

All practicable measures have been taken to maximize downstream water quality potential and fish passage.

(C)

If the applicable criteria are not met in the stream or river segment immediately upstream of the water body, then no further measurable downstream degradation of water quality has taken place due to stratification of the reservoir or managed lake.

(12)

Compliance schedules. In a permit issued under OAR 340, division 045 or in a water quality certification under OAR 340, division 48, the department may include compliance schedules for the implementation of effluent limits derived from water quality criteria in this division. A compliance schedule in an NPDES permit is allowed only for water quality based effluent limits that are newly applicable to the permit and must comply with provisions in 40 CFR §122.47 (including the requirement that water quality criteria must be achieved as soon as possible).
[NOTE: Referenced publications are available from the agency.]

Source: Rule 340-041-0061 — Other Implementation of Water Quality Criteria, https://secure.­sos.­state.­or.­us/oard/view.­action?ruleNumber=340-041-0061.

340‑041‑0001
Preface
340‑041‑0002
Definitions
340‑041‑0004
Antidegradation
340‑041‑0007
Statewide Narrative Criteria
340‑041‑0009
Bacteria
340‑041‑0011
Biocriteria
340‑041‑0016
Dissolved Oxygen
340‑041‑0019
Nuisance Phytoplankton Growth
340‑041‑0021
pH
340‑041‑0028
Temperature
340‑041‑0031
Total Dissolved Gas
340‑041‑0032
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
340‑041‑0033
Toxic Substances
340‑041‑0036
Turbidity
340‑041‑0046
Water Quality Limited Waters
340‑041‑0053
Mixing Zones
340‑041‑0057
Implementation at Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works
340‑041‑0059
Variances
340‑041‑0061
Other Implementation of Water Quality Criteria
340‑041‑0101
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Columbia River): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Main Stem Columbia River
340‑041‑0103
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Columbia River): Approved TMDLs in the Basin
340‑041‑0104
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Columbia River): Water Quality Standards and Policies Specific to the Main Stem Columbia River
340‑041‑0121
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Snake River): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Main Stem Snake River
340‑041‑0122
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Snake River): Approved TMDLs in the Basin
340‑041‑0124
Basin-Specific Criteria (Main Stem Snake River): Water Quality Standards and Policies Specific to the Main Stem Snake River
340‑041‑0130
Basin-Specific Criteria (Deschutes): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Deschutes Basin
340‑041‑0133
Basin-Specific Criteria (Deschutes): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0135
Basin-Specific Criteria (Deschutes): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0140
Basin-Specific Criteria (Goose and Summer Lakes): Beneficial Uses to be Protected in Goose and Summer Lake Basins
340‑041‑0143
Basin-Specific Criteria (Goose and Summer Lakes): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0145
Basin-Specific Criteria (Goose and Summer Lakes): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0151
Basin-Specific Criteria (Grande Ronde): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Grande Ronde Basin
340‑041‑0154
Basin-Specific Criteria (Grande Ronde): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0156
Basin-Specific Criteria (Grande Ronde): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0160
Basin-Specific Criteria (Hood): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Hood Basin
340‑041‑0164
Basin-Specific Criteria (Hood): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0165
Basin-Specific Criteria (Hood): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0170
Basin-Specific Criteria (John Day): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the John Day Basin
340‑041‑0174
Basin-Specific Criteria (John Day): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0175
Basin-Specific Criteria (John Day): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0180
Basin-Specific Criteria (Klamath): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Klamath Basin
340‑041‑0184
Basin-Specific Criteria (Klamath): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0185
Basin-Specific Criteria (Klamath): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0190
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur Lake): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Malheur Lake Basin
340‑041‑0194
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur Lake): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0195
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur Lake): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0201
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur River):Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Malheur River Basin
340‑041‑0204
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur River): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0207
Basin-Specific Criteria (Malheur River): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0220
Basin-Specific Criteria (Mid Coast Basin): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Mid Coast Basin
340‑041‑0224
Basin-Specific Criteria (Mid Coast Basin): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0225
Basin-Specific Criteria (Mid Coast Basin): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0230
Basin-Specific Criteria (North Coast): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the North Coast Basin
340‑041‑0234
Basin-Specific Criteria (North Coast): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0235
Basin-Specific Criteria (North Coast): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0250
Basin-Specific Criteria (Owyhee): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Owyhee Basin
340‑041‑0254
Basin-Specific Criteria (Owyhee): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0256
Basin-Specific Criteria (Owyhee): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0260
Basin-Specific Criteria (Powder/Burnt): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Powder/Burnt Basins
340‑041‑0264
Basin-Specific Criteria (Powder/Burnt): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0265
Basin-Specific Criteria (Powder/Burnt): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0271
Basin-Specific Criteria (Rogue): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Rogue Basin
340‑041‑0274
Basin-Specific Criteria (Rogue): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0275
Basin-Specific Criteria (Rogue): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0286
Basin-Specific Criteria (Sandy Basin): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Sandy Basin
340‑041‑0289
Basin-Specific Criteria (Sandy Basin): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0290
Basin-Specific Criteria (Sandy Basin): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0300
Basin-Specific Criteria (South Coast): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the South Coast Basin
340‑041‑0304
Basin-Specific Criteria (South Coast): Approved TMDLs in the Basin
340‑041‑0305
Water Quality Standards and Policies for South Coast Basin
340‑041‑0310
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umatilla): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Umatilla Basin
340‑041‑0314
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umatilla): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0315
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umatilla): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0320
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umpqua Basin): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Umpqua Basin
340‑041‑0324
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umpqua Basin): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0326
Basin-Specific Criteria (Umpqua Basin): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0330
Basin-Specific Criteria (Walla Walla): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Walla Walla Basin
340‑041‑0334
Basin-Specific Criteria (Walla Walla): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0336
Basin-Specific Criteria (Walla Walla): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0340
Basin-Specific Criteria (Willamette): Beneficial Uses to Be Protected in the Willamette Basin
340‑041‑0344
Basin-Specific Criteria (Willamette): Approved TMDLs in the Basin:
340‑041‑0345
Basin-Specific Criteria (Willamette): Water Quality Standards and Policies for this Basin
340‑041‑0350
The Three Basin Rule: Clackamas, McKenzie (above RM 15) & the North Santiam
340‑041‑8033
Division 41 Tables and Figures
Last Updated

Jun. 8, 2021

Rule 340-041-0061’s source at or​.us