OAR 660-024-0060
Metro Boundary Location Alternatives Analysis
(1)
When considering a Metro UGB amendment, Metro must determine which land to add by evaluating alternative urban growth boundary locations. For Metro, this determination must be consistent with the priority of land specified in ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary) and the boundary location factors of Goal 14, as follows:(a)
Beginning with the highest priority of land available, Metro must determine which land in that priority is suitable to accommodate the need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050 (Land Inventory and Response to Deficiency).(b)
If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the need deficiency, Metro must apply the location factors of Goal 14 to choose which land in that priority to include in the Metro UGB.(c)
If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category is not adequate to satisfy the identified need deficiency, Metro must determine which land in the next priority is suitable to accommodate the remaining need, and proceed using the same method specified in subsections (a) and (b) of this section until the land need is accommodated.(d)
Notwithstanding subsection (a) to (c) of this section, Metro may consider land of lower priority as specified in ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary)(3).(e)
For purposes of this section, the determination of suitable land to accommodate land needs must include consideration of any suitability characteristics specified under section (5) of this rule, as well as other provisions of law applicable in determining whether land is buildable or suitable.(2)
Notwithstanding OAR 660-024-0050 (Land Inventory and Response to Deficiency)(4) and subsection (1)(c) of this rule, except during a legislative review of the Metro UGB, Metro may approve an application under ORS 197.610 (Submission of proposed comprehensive plan or land use regulation changes to Department of Land Conservation and Development) to 197.625 (Acknowledgment of comprehensive plan or land use regulation changes) for a Metro UGB amendment proposing to add an amount of land less than necessary to satisfy the land need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050 (Land Inventory and Response to Deficiency)(4), provided the amendment complies with all other applicable requirements.(3)
The boundary location factors of Goal 14 are not independent criteria. When the factors are applied to compare alternative boundary locations and to determine the Metro UGB location, Metro must show that all the factors were considered and balanced.(4)
In determining alternative land for evaluation under ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary), “land adjacent to the UGB” is not limited to those lots or parcels that abut the UGB, but also includes land in the vicinity of the UGB that has a reasonable potential to satisfy the identified need deficiency.(5)
If Metro has specified characteristics such as parcel size, topography, or proximity that are necessary for land to be suitable for an identified need, Metro may limit its consideration to land that has the specified characteristics when it conducts the boundary location alternatives analysis and applies ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary).(6)
The adopted findings for a Metro UGB adoption or amendment must describe or map all of the alternative areas evaluated in the boundary location alternatives analysis. If the analysis involves more than one parcel or area within a particular priority category in ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary) for which circumstances are the same, these parcels or areas may be considered and evaluated as a single group.(7)
For purposes of Goal 14 Boundary Location Factor 2, “public facilities and services” means water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, and transportation facilities.(8)
The Goal 14 boundary location determination requires evaluation and comparison of the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages of alternative Metro UGB expansion areas with respect to the provision of public facilities and services needed to urbanize alternative boundary locations. This evaluation and comparison must be conducted in coordination with service providers, including the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) with regard to impacts on the state transportation system. “Coordination” includes timely notice to service providers and the consideration of evaluation methodologies recommended by service providers. The evaluation and comparison must include:(a)
The impacts to existing water, sanitary sewer, storm water and transportation facilities that serve nearby areas already inside the Metro UGB;(b)
The capacity of existing public facilities and services to serve areas already inside the UGB as well as areas proposed for addition to the Metro UGB; and(c)
The need for new transportation facilities, such as highways and other roadways, interchanges, arterials and collectors, additional travel lanes, other major improvements on existing roadways and, for urban areas of 25,000 or more, the provision of public transit service.
Source:
Rule 660-024-0060 — Metro Boundary Location Alternatives Analysis, https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/view.action?ruleNumber=660-024-0060.