Procedure by claimant on disallowance of claim
Source:
Section 115.145 — Procedure by claimant on disallowance of claim, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors115.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Action against residuary legatee of estate for restitution of amount paid by plaintiff on obligation owed by estate was properly dismissed where plaintiff failed to exercise statutory rights against estate. First Interstate Bank v. Haynes, 73 Or App 714, 699 P2d 1168 (1985), Sup Ct review denied, on reconsideration 75 Or App 18, 704 P2d 1165 (1985)
Order granting motion to strike petition by bank to reopen estate was appealable order and res judicata bars second action by bank against residuary legatee of estate where legatee was re-named personal representative in second suit and other principles of res judicata applied. First Interstate Bank v. Haynes, 87 Or App 700, 743 P2d 1139 (1987)
Procedural mechanism for filing request for summary determination or commencing action against estate does not create new rights, therefore time limitation does not apply to government entities. Department of Human Resources v. Payne, 157 Or App 612, 970 P2d 266 (1998)
When read with ORS 115.165, personal representative of decedent may not assert counterclaim in summary determination proceeding. Flaig v. Emert, 260 Or App 652, 320 P3d 586 (2014)
Law Review Citations
26 WLR 284 (1990)