Local Improvements and Works Generally

ORS 223.590
Tender of purchase price in action to recover property


In any action, suit or proceeding referred to in ORS 223.585 (Time limitation on actions to recover sold property), whether before or after the issuance of the deed, the party claiming to be the owner as against the party claiming under the sale must tender with the first pleading of the party and pay into the court at the time of filing such pleading the amount of the purchase price for which the lands were sold, together with the penalties prescribed by law at the time of the sale, and of all taxes and final assessments or liens, or both, levied or made upon or against the land, or any part thereof, which were paid after the sale by the purchaser at the sale, or the heirs or assigns of the purchaser, together with interest thereon at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the respective times of the payment of the purchase price, taxes, final assessments or liens, or both, by the purchaser, or the heirs or assigns of the purchaser, up to the time of the filing of the pleading, to be paid to the purchaser, or the heirs or assigns of the purchaser, in case the right or title of the purchaser at the sale fails in such action, suit or proceeding. [Amended by 1991 c.902 §69]
§§ 223.510 to 223.590

Law Review Citations

52 OLR 175-189 (1973)

Chapter 223

Notes of Decisions

Fact that ordinance, which charged fee to property owners taking advantage of privilege of making connection to city water system, specified that payment would be secured by liens which would be "enforced" in matter provided by this chapter did not, of itself, show that such charges were "assessments." Montgomery Brothers v. City of Corvallis, 34 Or App 785, 580 P2d 190 (1978)

Circuit court has jurisdiction to determine merits of assessment, but cannot address whether assessment is subject to constitutional limits on property taxes. Martin v. City of Tigard, 14 OTR 517 (1999), aff'd 335 Or 444, 72 P3d 619 (2003)

State statutory procedures for financing local improvements are not exclusive and do not displace consistent local procedures. Baker v. City of Woodburn, 190 Or App 445, 79 P3d 901 (2003), Sup Ct review denied


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021