Discrimination in place of public accommodation prohibited
Source:
Section 659A.403 — Discrimination in place of public accommodation prohibited, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors659A.html (accessed May 26, 2025).
Notes of Decisions
Racial insults made by employe of place of public accommodation to customer in the course of service to that customer constituted “distinction, discrimination or restriction on account of race” in contravention of this section. King v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 61 Or App 197, 656 P2d 349 (1982)
Place of public accommodation may not treat persons between ages of 18 and 21 differentially unless statute authorizes differential treatment. Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp., 315 Or App 129, 500 P3d 711 (2021)
Oregon Public Accommodations Act does not impermissibly burden beauty pageant operator’s protected expression under Article I, section 8 of Oregon Constitution, by requiring inclusion of transgender contestant. Green v. Miss United States of America, LLC, 533 F. Supp. 3d 978 (D. Or. 2021), aff’d on other grounds, 52 F4th 773 (9th Cir. 2022), rehearing denied, 61 F4th 1095 (9th Cir. 2023)
By requiring inclusion of transgender contestant, Oregon Public Accommodations Act would compel beauty pageant operator to express message contrary to what it desires to express, in violation of First Amendment to United States Constitution. Green v. Miss United States of America, LLC, 52 F4th 773 (9th Cir. 2022), rehearing denied, 61 F4th 1095 (9th Cir. 2023)
Attorney General Opinions
Use of Military Department facilities, trucks, or color guards by organizations which discriminate on the basis of race, religion or sex, (1977) Vol 38, p 929; Hotel limiting use to members of religious foundation as place of public accommodation, (1983) Vol 44, p 20
Law Review Citations
27 WLR 137 (1991)