OAR 690-051-0320
Competing Applications
(1)
When filed with the Director, a notice of competing application shall also be served on other applicants for the same site.(2)
A competing application shall be filed with the Director within 180 days of the time the original application is filed. If a hearing notice for the original application has been published before 180 days have passed, a notice of intent to file a competing application shall be filed. The notice of intent shall be filed prior to the closing date for comments as stated in the hearing notice. The competing application itself shall be filed within 60 days of the comment closing date.(3)
When determining which competing application should be given preference, the Director shall consider:(a)
Conservation of the waterpower involved including:(A)
Efficiency within the system;(B)
Effect on instream fisheries;(C)
Water quality; and(D)
Other factors as the Director may deem appropriate.(b)
Use of the waterpower involved including:(A)
Availability of water;(B)
Existing rights;(C)
Development of the available hydroelectric potential; and(D)
Other factors as the Director may deem appropriate.(4)
If the Director finds that both applications are equally well adapted to conserve and utilize the waterpower involved and are equal in every other way, preference shall be given to the application with the earliest filing date.(5)
If the Director finds that both applications are equally well adapted to conserve and utilize the waterpower involved and one applicant is a municipal corporation and the other is a private developer, preference shall be given to the municipal corporation.(6)
If the Director finds that both applications are equally well adapted to conserve and utilize the waterpower involved and one applicant is the holder of a valid Preliminary Permit and has priority under ORS 543.250 (Permit), preference shall be given to the holder of the Preliminary Permit.(7)
Where one application is determined to be best adapted to conserve and utilize the water power involved and the other applicant is either a municipal corporation or has priority as the holder of a Preliminary Permit, the municipal corporation or holder of the Preliminary Permit shall be informed of specific reasons why its application is not as well adapted and shall be afforded a reasonable period of time to amend its application to be at least as well adapted as the competing application. If its application is amended to be at least as well adapted within the time allowed, preference will be given to the municipal corporation or holder of the Preliminary Permit.
Source:
Rule 690-051-0320 — Competing Applications, https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/view.action?ruleNumber=690-051-0320.