OAR 731-070-0055
Fees to Accompany Unsolicited Proposals

(1)

The unsolicited proposal review fees required by OAR 731-070-0050 (Submission of Unsolicited Proposals for OIPP Projects)(2) are as follows, unless otherwise specified in sections (2) or (3) of this rule:

(a)

For Detailed Proposals, as defined in OAR 731-070-0060 (Contents and Format of Detailed or Competing Proposals)(1):

(A)

A $10,000 non-refundable fee for a project under $100 million; and

(B)

A $40,000 non-refundable fee for a project $100 million or more.

(b)

If ODOT invites Competing Detailed Proposals as described in OAR 731-070-0130 (Competing Proposals), each Competing Detailed Proposal shall be accompanied by the fees described in (1)(a).

(2)

If the cost of evaluating an unsolicited proposal exceeds the fees assessed under section (1) of this rule, the Director may assess additional fees that reflect the reasonable expected costs to be incurred by ODOT in evaluating the unsolicited proposal that exceed the amount deposited in section (1) of this rule.

(3)

The Director may waive the fees specified in sections (1) and (2) of this rule if the interests of the state or the specific merits of the project would warrant such a waiver. In considering whether to grant a waiver the Director will consider the magnitude of costs versus benefits of such a waiver.

Source: Rule 731-070-0055 — Fees to Accompany Unsolicited Proposals, https://secure.­sos.­state.­or.­us/oard/view.­action?ruleNumber=731-070-0055.

731‑070‑0005
Purpose and Intent of the Oregon Innovative Partnerships Program 731‑070‑0010
Definitions for the Oregon Innovative Partnerships Program 731‑070‑0020
General Selection Policies 731‑070‑0040
Protection of ODOT from Proposer “Monopolization” of Site Claims 731‑070‑0042
Solicitation of Proposals for OIPP Projects 731‑070‑0044
Negotiations 731‑070‑0046
Solicitation Documents 731‑070‑0048
Public Notice of Solicitation 731‑070‑0050
Submission of Unsolicited Proposals for OIPP Projects 731‑070‑0055
Fees to Accompany Unsolicited Proposals 731‑070‑0060
Contents and Format of Detailed or Competing Proposals 731‑070‑0080
Additional Proposer Organizational Disclosure Requirements 731‑070‑0110
Initial Review of Unsolicited Proposals 731‑070‑0120
Commission Preliminary Review of Unsolicited Proposals 731‑070‑0130
Competing Proposals 731‑070‑0140
Evaluation of Unsolicited and Competing Proposals 731‑070‑0160
Use of a Process that Permits ODOT Feedback and Ability of Proponents to Supplement or Refine Proposals after Initial Submission 731‑070‑0170
Commission Review and Selection of Proposals 731‑070‑0180
Protests of Rejection of Proposal/Award of Contract to Competitor in Competing Proposals Context 731‑070‑0200
Negotiation of Agreements for Transportation Projects 731‑070‑0210
ODOT Objection to Subcontractors 731‑070‑0220
Legal Sufficiency Review of Final Agreement 731‑070‑0230
Commission Review of Final Agreement 731‑070‑0280
Public Records Requests 731‑070‑0290
Designation of Sensitive Business, Commercial or Financial Information and Trade Secrets 731‑070‑0295
Consultation with Local Government, Metropolitan Planning Organization or Area Commission on Transportation 731‑070‑0300
ODOT Rights Reserved 731‑070‑0310
Extensions of Time: Waivers 731‑070‑0320
ODOT’s Authority to Suspend, by “Order,” the Acceptance of Specified Categories of Unsolicited Proposals 731‑070‑0330
ODOT’s Authority to Prioritize the Processing of Submitted Proposals in Accordance with ODOT’s Assessment of Need and Urgency. 731‑070‑0350
Discretionary Order Requiring the Prequalification of Proposers — Detailed Unsolicited or Competing Proposals
Last Updated

Jun. 8, 2021

Rule 731-070-0055’s source at or​.us