Regulation of development
Source:
Section 227.215 — Regulation of development, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors227.html
.
See also annotations under ORS 227.220, 227.230 and 227.240 in permanent edition.
Notes of Decisions
Under former similar statutes (ORS 227.220, 227.230)
Once a planned unit development is approved, the developer is bound by it unless changes are approved pursuant to the applicable ordinance. Frankland v. City of Lake Oswego, 267 Or 452, 517 P2d 1042 (1973)
A properly enacted comprehensive plan, although denominated a “resolution,” controls zoning decisions in a city. Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500, 533 P2d 772 (1975)
A comprehensive plan is the controlling land use planning instrument for a city; upon its passage, the city assumes responsibility to effectuate the plan and conform zoning ordinances, including prior existing zoning ordinances, to it. Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500, 533 P2d 772 (1975)
In determining whether a municipal action is an ordinance rather than a resolution, it is necessary to look beyond the title to determine whether it is legislative and permanent rather than administrative and temporary. Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500, 533 P2d 772 (1975)
The party seeking a zoning change did not show that the proposed change was required by public need. So. Cen. Assn. of Neighbors v. Lindsey, 21 Or App 578, 535 P2d 1381 (1975)
The city council was authorized to adopt a change in its comprehensive plan. Tierney v. Duris, PayLess Prop. Corp., 21 Or App 613, 536 P2d 435 (1975)
The city council could adopt supplemental findings of facts supporting its earlier plan-change decision. Tierney v. Duris, PayLess Prop. Corp., 21 Or App 613, 536 P2d 435 (1975)
The power to regulate, restrict and segregate different classes of businesses in a city by ordinance is reserved to the city council. Link v. City of Coos Bay, 23 Or App 648, 543 P2d 1082 (1975)
Attorney General Opinions
In general
City granting conditional zone change, (1979) Vol 39, p 467