Agreement for compensation
- status of resolution or ordinance of public condemner
- status of action of private condemner
- agreement effort not prerequisite
Source:
Section 35.235 — Agreement for compensation; status of resolution or ordinance of public condemner; status of action of private condemner; agreement effort not prerequisite, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors035.html
.
Notes of Decisions
The condemner is mandated to negotiate with an owner prior to commencing an action. State Hwy. Comm. v. Freeman, 11 Or App 513, 504 P2d 133 (1972)
Across-the-fence method of appraisal was properly admitted as evidence in condemnation case as trial court has wide discretion in ruling on admissibility of evidence and any competent evidence tending to affect market value which would be considered by a purchaser or seller is admissible. Dept. of Trans. v. Southern Pacific Trans. Co., 89 Or App 344, 749 P2d 1233 (1988), Sup Ct review denied
Where provision in this section that public condemner’s taking resolution is presumptive evidence use will be compatible with greatest public good and least private injury, court is empowered to determine whether economic impact of taking is such that taking is abuse of discretion by condemner. Emerald PUD v. Pacificorp, 100 Or App 79, 784 P2d 1112 (1990), Sup Ct review denied, on reconsideration 101 Or App 48, 788 P2d 1034 (1990)
This section does not violate Article XI, section 12 of Oregon Constitution. Emerald PUD v. Pacificorp, 100 Or App 79, 784 P2d 1112 (1990), Sup Ct review denied, on reconsideration 101 Or App 48, 788 P2d 1034 (1990)
That resolution or ordinance of condemner is “presumptive evidence” means determination is presumed valid in absence of fraud, bad faith or abuse of discretion. Wiard Memorial Park District v. Wiard Community Pool, 183 Or App 448, 52 P3d 1080 (2002), Sup Ct review denied