OAR 340-011-0575
Contested Cases: Review of Proposed Orders in Contested Cases


For purposes of this rule, filing means receipt in the office of the director or other office of DEQ.


Commencement of Review by the Commission: The proposed order will become final unless a participant or a member of the commission files a Petition for Commission Review within 30 days of service of the proposed order. The timely filing of a Petition is a jurisdictional requirement and cannot be waived. Any participant may file a petition whether or not another participant has filed a petition.


Contents of the Petition for Commission Review. A petition must be in writing and need only state the participant’s or a commissioner’s intent that the commission review the proposed order. Each petition and subsequent brief must be captioned to indicate the participant filing the document and the type of document (for example: Respondents Exceptions and Brief; DEQ’s Answer to Respondent’s Exceptions and Brief).


Procedures on Review:


Exceptions and Brief: Within 30 days from the filing of a petition, the participant(s) filing the petition must file written exceptions and brief. The exceptions must specify those findings and conclusions objected to, and also include proposed alternative findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order with specific references to the parts of the record upon which the participant relies. The brief must include the arguments supporting these alternative findings of fact, conclusions of law and order. Failure to take an exception to a finding or conclusion in the brief, waives the participant’s ability to later raise that exception.


Answering Brief: Each participant, except for the participant(s) filing that exceptions and brief, will have 30 days from the date of filing of the exceptions and brief under subsection (4)(a), in which to file an answering brief.


Reply Brief: If an answering brief is filed, the participant(s) who filed a petition will have 20 days from the date of filing of the answering brief under subsection (4)(b), in which to file a reply brief.


Briefing on Commission Invoked Review: When one or more members of the commission wish to review the proposed order, and no participant has timely filed a Petition, the chair of the commission will promptly notify the participants of the issue that the commission desires the participants to brief. The participants must limit their briefs to those issues. The chair of the commission will also establish the schedule for filing of briefs. When the commission wishes to review the proposed order and a participant also requested review, briefing will follow the schedule set forth in subsections (a), (b) and (c) of this section.


Extensions: The commission or director may extend any of the time limits contained in section (4) of this rule. Each extension request must be in writing and filed with the commission before the expiration of the time limit. Any request for an extension may be granted or denied in whole or in part.


Dismissal: The commission may dismiss any petition, upon motion of any participant or on its own motion, if the participant(s) seeking review fails to timely file the exceptions or brief required under subsection (4)(a) of this rule. A motion to dismiss made by a participant must be filed within 45 days after the filing of the Petition. At the time of dismissal, the commission will also enter a final order upholding the proposed order.


Oral Argument: Following the expiration of the time allowed the participants to present exceptions and briefs, the matter will be scheduled for oral argument before the commission.


Additional Evidence: A request to present additional evidence must be submitted by motion and must be accompanied by a statement showing good cause for the failure to present the evidence to the administrative law judge. The motion must accompany the brief filed under subsection (4)(a) or (b) of this rule. If the commission grants the motion or decides on its own motion that additional evidence is necessary, the matter will be remanded to an administrative law judge for further proceedings.


Scope of Review: The commission may substitute its judgment for that of the administrative law judge in making any particular finding of fact, conclusion of law, or order except as limited by ORS 183.650 (Form of order) and OAR 137-003-0665 (Final Orders in Contested Cases).


All documents filed with the commission under this rule must also be copied upon each participant in the contested case hearing.

Source: Rule 340-011-0575 — Contested Cases: Review of Proposed Orders in Contested Cases, https://secure.­sos.­state.­or.­us/oard/view.­action?ruleNumber=340-011-0575.

Confidentiality and Inadmissibility of Mediation Communications
Confidentiality and Inadmissibility of Workplace Interpersonal Dispute Mediation Communications
Rules of Practice and Procedure: Definitions
Rules of Practice and Procedure: Incorporation of Attorney General’s Uniform and Model Rules
Rulemaking: Notice of Rulemaking
Rulemaking: Rulemaking Process
Rulemaking: Policy on Disclosure of the Relationship Between Proposed Rules and Federal Requirements
Rulemaking: Petition to Promulgate, Amend, or Repeal Rule: Contents of Petition, Filing of Petition
Rulemaking: Temporary Rules
Rulemaking: Periodic Rule Review
Rulemaking: Declaratory Ruling: Institution of Proceedings, Consideration of Petition and Disposition of Petition
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Purpose
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Scope
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Requests for Review or to Obtain Copies of Public Records
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Costs for Record Review and Copying
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Collecting Fees
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Certification of Copies of Records
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Fee Waivers and Reductions
Public Records Access and Reproduction: Exempt Records
Contested Cases: Contested Case Proceedings Generally
Contested Cases: Powers of the Director
Contested Cases: Agency Representation by Environmental Law Specialist
Contested Cases: Authorized Representative of a Participant other than a Natural Person in a Contested Case Hearing
Contested Cases: Liability for the Acts of a Person’s Employees
Contested Cases: Service and Filing of Documents
Contested Cases: Requests for Hearing
Contested Cases: Final Orders by Default
Contested Cases: Consolidation or Bifurcation of Contested Case Hearings
Contested Cases: Burden and Standard of Proof in Contested Case Hearings
Contested Cases: Discovery
Contested Cases: Subpoenas
Contested Cases: Public Attendance at Contested Case Hearing
Contested Cases: Immediate Review
Contested Cases: Permissible Scope of Hearing
Contested Cases: Proposed Orders in Contested Cases
Contested Cases: Review of Proposed Orders in Contested Cases
Contested Cases: Petitions for Reconsideration or Rehearing
Contested Cases: Petitions for a Stay of the Effect of a Final Order
Last Updated

Jun. 8, 2021

Rule 340-011-0575’s source at or​.us