Investigation
- hearings
- consent to discipline
- recommendation
- temporary suspension
Source:
Section 1.420 — Investigation; hearings; consent to discipline; recommendation; temporary suspension, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors001.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Since there are no separate grounds for suspension, in recommending suspension the commission must prove the accused was guilty of one of the specific grounds for removal as stated in Article VII (Amended), §8. In re Piper, 271 Or 726, 534 P2d 159 (1975)
Continued work by the accused upon four decedents’ estates over a period of 10 years after becoming a circuit judge did not involve “moral turpitude.” In re Piper, 271 Or 726, 534 P2d 159 (1975)
The words “complaint from any person” in this section did not impose a requirement that there be a formal complaint by some identifiable person or that the accused judge be informed of the identity of any complainant or be provided with a copy of the complaint when the facts were not in dispute. In the Matter of Sawyer, 286 Or 369, 594 P2d 805 (1979)
Commission on Judicial Fitness had jurisdiction to inquire into justice’s alleged failure to abide by Code of Judicial Conduct. In re Fadeley, 310 Or 548, 802 P2d 31 (1990)
Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability lacks authority to hear complaints against municipal judges. State ex rel Kaino v. Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability, 335 Or 633, 74 P3d 1080 (2003)