Financial abuse subject to action
Source:
Section 124.110 — Financial abuse subject to action, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors124.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Taking is “wrongful” if carried out in pursuit of improper motive or by improper means. Church v. Woods, 190 Or App 112, 77 P3d 1150 (2003)
“Unfounded litigation” as predicate for elder abuse claim under this section can satisfy, at most, “wrongful conduct” element; noneconomic effects suffered as result of litigation do not prove taking of money or property belonging to elderly person as required under this section. Schmidt v. Noonkester, 287 Or App 48, 401 P3d 266 (2017)
Plaintiff’s contractual rights to benefits under insurance policies received in exchange for premiums does not constitute same “money or property” that insurance company acquired from plaintiffs in form of premium payments; thus, allegations that insurance company, in bad faith, delayed processing of claims and failed to pay benefits owed to vulnerable persons under insurance contract do not state claim for wrongful withholding of “money or property” under subsection (1)(b) of this section. Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co., 362 Or 337, 408 P3d 1081 (2018)
Where plaintiff had contract expectancy that plaintiff would appear on deed with defendant, even without written agreement between parties, contract expectancy is property interest which, if wrongfully taken through misrepresentation by nondisclosure, could support claim for elder abuse under this section. Neel v. Lee, 316 Or App 159, 504 P3d 26 (2021)
Law Review Citations
52 WLR 325 (2016)