Administration of State Institutions

ORS 179.495
Disclosure of written accounts of adult in custody

  • penalty


(1)

Written accounts of the adults in custody of any Department of Corrections institution as defined in ORS 421.005 (Definitions), maintained in the institution by the officers or employees of the institution who are authorized to maintain written accounts within the official scope of their duties, are not subject to disclosure unless the disclosure is permitted or authorized by the Department of Corrections in compliance with ORS 179.505 (Disclosure of written accounts by health care services provider) (3), (4), (6), (7), (9), (11), (12), (14), (15), (16) or (17) or 179.508 (Disclosure of individually identifiable health information about adult in custody) or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction. The restriction contained in this section does not apply to disclosure of written accounts made under ORS 179.505 (Disclosure of written accounts by health care services provider) (3) with the authorization of the individual or a personal representative of the individual.

(2)

Except as authorized under subsection (1) of this section, any person who discloses or any person who knowingly obtains information from a written account referred to in subsection (1) of this section commits a Class B violation.

(3)

As used in this section, “disclosure,” “personal representative” and “written account” have the meanings given those terms in ORS 179.505 (Disclosure of written accounts by health care services provider). [1955 c.452 §1; 1969 c.597 §44; 1973 c.736 §3; 1977 c.812 §5; 1987 c.320 §133; 1991 c.807 §2; 1999 c.1051 §165; 2003 c.14 §76; 2003 c.88 §1; 2005 c.498 §4; 2019 c.213 §52]

Notes of Decisions

Circuit court order to enforce subpoena issued by workers' compensation administrative law judge is "order of court of competent jurisdiction." Coman v. Corrections Dept., 327 Or 449, 960 P2d 383 (1998)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Access to Mental Health Division's patient records, (1973) Vol 36, p 658; use of division's client records by another departmental division, (1974) Vol 37, p 186


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021