OAR 738-124-0060
Aviation Review Committee (ARC) Review and Recommendation of COAR and ROAR Applications

(1) The ARC shall hold public meetings as necessary to review eligible applications and to prepare approval and rejection recommendations to the Board.
(2) In reviewing applications, ARC shall consider:
(a) For COAR applications: The extent to which, if implemented, the project proposed in the Application would:
(A) Assist airports in Oregon with match requirements for FAA Airport Improvement Program grants;
(B) Support emergency preparedness and infrastructure goals in accordance with the Oregon Resilience Plan or the Oregon Aviation Plan; or
(C) Support services critical or essential to aviation, including, but not limited to, fuel, sewer, water and weather equipment; support aviation-related business development, including, but not limited to, hangars, parking for business aircraft and related facilities; or support airport development for local economic benefit, including, but not limited to, signs and marketing.
(b) For ROAR applications: the extent to which the project proposed in the Application would, if implemented, assist commercial air service to Rural Oregon.
(c) Whether the project proposed in the application:
(A) Reduces transportation costs for Oregon businesses or improves access to jobs and sources of labor in Oregon;
(B) Results in an economic benefit to Oregon;
(C) Connects elements of Oregon’s aviation system in a way that will measurably improve utilization and efficiency of the system;
(D) Is ready for construction or implementation, including whether the project has any unique construction-readiness, project implementation challenges, or possible delays; and
(E) Has a useful life expectancy that offers maximum benefit to Oregon.
(d) How much of the costs of the project proposed in the application can be borne by the Applicant from sources other than the Department or the Connect Oregon Fund.
(3) For each applicable criterion, the ARC will rate whether the proposed project “Meets,” “Somewhat Meets” or “Does not Meet” the criterion. For purposes of this process, those terms have the following meanings:
(a) “Meets” means that the Applicant explained in a thorough and specific manner how the project meets the criterion and provided thorough evidence, including specific facts, specific examples, reliable figures, or detailed citations to supporting attachments to the application to support the Applicant’s explanation.
(b) “Somewhat Meets” means that the Applicant provided a general, superficial or non-specific explanation how the project meets the criterion or provided only limited or incomplete supporting evidence to support the Applicant’s explanation.
(c) “Does Not Meet” means that either:
(A) The Applicant reported that the project did not meet the criterion; or
(B) The Applicant provided an incomplete or implausible explanation of how the project meets the criterion or provided no evidence or only minimal, implausible or unreliable evidence to support the Applicant’s explanation.
(4) Prioritizing COAR applications: In prioritizing applications submitted for COAR funds, the ARC may consider the following factors:
(a) Applicant that is able to bear the most cost.
(b) Projects related to safety or infrastructure.
(c) Quantity of projects applied for at an airport, within the same grant cycle.
(d) Regional significance.
(5) Based on its review of eligible applications, the ARC shall:
(a) Prepare a brief written statement to the Board with respect to each application which recommends approval or rejection by the Board.
(b) For COAR applications for which the ARC recommends Board approval, the ARC shall prepare a prioritized list of applications, ranking them in the following priority:
(A) First, to assist airports in Oregon with match requirements for FAA Airport Improvement Program grants.
(B) Second, to make grants for emergency preparedness and infrastructure projects, in accordance with the Oregon Resilience Plan or the Oregon Aviation Plan.
(C) Third, to make grants for:
(i) Services critical or essential to aviation, including, but not limited to, fuel, sewer, water, navigational aids and weather equipment; or
(ii) Aviation-related business development, including, but not limited to, hangars, parking for business aircraft and related facilities; or
(iii) Airport development for local economic benefit, including, but not limited to, signs and marketing.
(6) The Department shall provide the ARC’s written responses and prioritized list to the Board as soon as practicable after the ARC’s review.

Source: Rule 738-124-0060 — Aviation Review Committee (ARC) Review and Recommendation of COAR and ROAR Applications, https://secure.­sos.­state.­or.­us/oard/view.­action?ruleNumber=738-124-0060.

Last Updated

Jun. 8, 2021

Rule 738-124-0060’s source at or​.us