Contents of petition when person challenges conditions of confinement or deprivation of rights while confined
Source:
Section 34.362 — Contents of petition when person challenges conditions of confinement or deprivation of rights while confined, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors034.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Placement in prison Intensive Management Unit does not raise issues subject to writ of habeas corpus. Troxel v. Maass, 120 Or App 397, 853 P2d 294 (1993)
Allegation that petitioner was being subjected to ongoing and periodical assaults by guards met minimum requirements for habeas corpus jurisdiction. Schafer v. Maass, 122 Or App 518, 858 P2d 474 (1993)
Civil rights lawsuit for tort damages and injunctive relief is not adequate alternative remedy for petitioner alleging unconstitutional imprisonment or restraint of person. Barrett v. Belleque, 344 Or 91, 176 P3d 1272 (2008)
Director of Department of Corrections is proper defendant in petition for writ of habeas corpus by transferred inmate in physical custody of receiving state pursuant to Interstate Corrections Compact under ORS 421.284 because sending state retains sole authority to remove inmate from conditions of which inmate complains and inmate remains in constructive custody of sending state. Taylor v. Peters, 360 Or 460, 383 P3d 279 (2016)