Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants

ORS 813.606
Exception for employee otherwise required to have device


Notwithstanding ORS 813.604 (Notice of court order), if a person is required, in the course and scope of the person’s employment, to operate a motor vehicle owned by the person’s employer, the person may operate that vehicle without installation of an ignition interlock device if:

(1)

The employer has been notified:

(a)

That the employee is operating with a hardship permit restricted as provided in ORS 813.604 (Notice of court order);

(b)

That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the first year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s first conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants;

(c)

That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the second year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s second or subsequent conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants; or

(d)

That the employee has driving privileges and is otherwise required to install an ignition interlock device as a condition of a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement; and

(2)

The employee has proof of the notification and, if applicable, a fully reinstated license in the possession of the employee while operating the employer’s vehicle in the course of employment. [1987 c.746 §4; 1999 c.770 §8; 2001 c.786 §5; 2011 c.355 §17; 2013 c.315 §2]

Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021