Defenses in prosecutions under ORS 167.075 and 167.080
Source:
Section 167.085 — Defenses in prosecutions under ORS 167.075 and 167.080, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors167.html
.
Notes of Decisions
State has the burden of proving elements of obscenity beyond a reasonable doubt. Film Follies v. Haas, 22 Or App 365, 539 P2d 669 (1975)
Defense available for certain instances of “showing, exhibition or display” of obscene materials to minors is insufficient to prevent prohibitory statute ([former] ORS 167.065) from being overbroad because defense does not reach all protected actions constituting “furnishing” of obscene materials under [former] ORS 167.065. State v. Maynard, 168 Or App 118, 5 P3d 1142 (2000), Sup Ct review denied
Law Review Citations
55 OLR 383-391 (1976)