Possession of a gambling device
- defense
Source:
Section 167.147 — Possession of a gambling device; defense, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors167.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Employment contract, which required employe to design and produce devices which would be used for gambling, constituted contract for illegal purpose and was thus unenforceable as against public policy. Hendrix v. McKee, 281 Or 123, 575 P2d 134 (1978)
“Free play” electric game machines are not “gambling devices” even though patrons were given cash rather than free plays. State v. Langan, 293 Or 654, 652 P2d 800 (1982)
COMPLETED CITATIONS: State v. Wheelhouse, 6 Or App 151, 486 P2d 1292 (1971)