OAR 137-047-0261
Multi-tiered and Multistep Proposals
(1)
Generally. A Contracting Agency may use one or more, or any combination, of the methods of Contractor selection set forth in ORS 279B.060 (Competitive sealed proposals)(7), 279B.060 (Competitive sealed proposals)(8) and this rule to procure Goods or Services. In addition to the procedures set forth in OAR 137-047-0300 (Public Notice of Solicitation Documents) through 137-047-0490 (Extension of Time for Acceptance of Offer) for methods of Contractor selection, a Contracting Agency may provide for a multi-tiered or multistep selection process that permits award to the highest ranked Proposer at any tier or step, calls for the establishment of a Competitive Range, or permits either serial or competitive simultaneous discussions or negotiations with one or more Proposers.(2)
When conducting a multi-tiered or multistep selection process, a Contracting Agency may use any combination or series of Proposals, discussions, negotiations, demonstrations, offers, or other means of soliciting information from Proposers that bears on the selection of a Contractor or Contractors. In multi-tiered and multistep competitions, a Contracting Agency may use these means of soliciting information from prospective Proposers and Proposers in any sequence or order, and at any stage of the selection process, as determined in the discretion of the Contracting Agency.(3)
When a Contracting Agency’s Request for Proposals prescribes a multi-tiered or multistep Contractor selection process, a Contracting Agency nevertheless may, at the completion of any stage in the competition and on determining the Most Advantageous Proposer (or, in multiple-award situations, on determining the awardees of the Public Contracts), award a Contract (or Contracts) and conclude the Procurement without proceeding to subsequent stages. The Contracting Agency also may, at any time, cancel the Procurement under ORS 279B.100 (Cancellation, rejection, delay of invitations for bids or requests for proposals).(4)
Exclusion Protest. A Contracting Agency may provide, before the notice of an intent to Award, an opportunity for a Proposer to protest exclusion from the Competitive Range or from subsequent phases of multi-tiered or multistep sealed Proposals as set forth in OAR 137-047-0720 (Protests and Judicial Review of Multi-Tiered and Multistep Solicitations).(5)
Award Protest. A Contracting Agency shall provide an opportunity to protest its intent to Award a Contract pursuant to ORS 279B.410 (Protests of contract award) and OAR 137-047-0740 (Protests and Judicial Review of Contract Award). An Affected Offeror may protest, for any of the bases set forth in 137-047-0720 (Protests and Judicial Review of Multi-Tiered and Multistep Solicitations)(2), its exclusion from the Competitive Range or from any phase of a multi-tiered or multistep sealed Proposal process, or may protest an Addendum issued following initial Closing, if the Contracting Agency did not previously provide Proposers the opportunity to protest the exclusion or Addendum. The failure to protest shall be considered the Proposer’s failure to pursue an administrative remedy made available to the Proposer by the Contracting Agency.(6)
Competitive Range. When a Contracting Agency’s solicitation process conducted under ORS 279B.060 (Competitive sealed proposals)(8) calls for the Contracting Agency to establish a Competitive Range at any stage in the Procurement process, the Contracting Agency may do so as follows:(a)
Determining Competitive Range.(A)
The Contracting Agency may establish a Competitive Range after evaluating all Responsive Proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria in the Request for Proposals. After evaluation of all Proposals in accordance with the criteria in the Request for Proposals, the Contracting Agency may determine and rank the Proposers in the Competitive Range. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, in instances in which the Contracting Agency determines that a single Proposer has a reasonable chance of being determined the most Advantageous Proposer, the Contracting Agency need not determine or rank Proposers in the Competitive Range. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, a Contracting Agency may establish a Competitive Range of all Proposers to enter into discussions to correct deficiencies in Proposals.(B)
The Contracting Agency may establish the number of Proposers in the Competitive Range in light of whether the Contracting Agency’s evaluation of Proposals identifies a number of Proposers who have a reasonable chance of being determined the most Advantageous Proposer, or whether the evaluation establishes a natural break in the scores of Proposers that indicates that a particular number of Proposers are closely competitive or have a reasonable chance of being determined the most Advantageous Proposer.(b)
Protesting Competitive Range. The Contracting Agency must provide Written notice to all Proposers identifying Proposers in the Competitive Range. A Contracting Agency may provide an opportunity for Proposers excluded from the Competitive Range to protest the Contracting Agency’s evaluation and determination of the Competitive Range in accordance with OAR 137-047-0720 (Protests and Judicial Review of Multi-Tiered and Multistep Solicitations).(7)
Discussions. The Contracting Agency may initiate oral or written discussions with all “eligible Proposers” on subject matter within the general scope of the Request for Proposals. In conducting discussions, the Contracting Agency:(a)
Shall treat all eligible Proposers fairly and shall not favor any eligible Proposer over another;(b)
May disclose other eligible Proposers’ Proposals or discussions only in accordance with ORS 279B.060 (Competitive sealed proposals)(8)(b) or (c);(c)
May adjust the evaluation of a Proposal as a result of discussions. The conditions, terms, or price of the Proposal may be changed during the course of the discussions provided the changes are within the scope of the Request for Proposals.(d)
At any time during the time allowed for discussions, the Contracting Agency may:(A)
Continue discussions with a particular eligible Proposer;(B)
Terminate discussions with a particular eligible Proposer and continue discussions with other eligible Proposers; or(C)
Conclude discussions with all remaining eligible Proposers and provide, to the then-eligible Proposers, notice requesting best and final Offers.(8)
Negotiations. A Contracting Agency may commence serial negotiations with the highest-ranked eligible Proposer or commence simultaneous negotiations with all eligible Proposers. A Contracting Agency may negotiate:(a)
The statement of work;(b)
The Contract Price as it is affected by negotiating the statement of work and other terms and conditions authorized for negotiation in the Request for Proposals or Addenda thereto; and(c)
Any other terms and conditions reasonably related to those authorized for negotiation in the Request for Proposals or Addenda thereto. Proposers shall not submit for negotiation, and a Contracting Agency shall not accept, alternative terms and conditions that are not reasonably related to those authorized for negotiation in the Request for Proposals or any Addendum.(9)
Terminating Negotiations. At any time during discussions or negotiations a Contracting Agency conducts under this rule, the Contracting Agency may terminate discussions or negotiations with the highest-ranked Proposer, or the eligible Proposer with whom it is currently discussing or negotiating, if the Contracting Agency reasonably believes that:(a)
The eligible Proposer is not discussing or negotiating in good faith; or(b)
Further discussions or negotiations with the eligible Proposer will not result in the parties agreeing to the terms and conditions of a Contract in a timely manner.(c)
Continuing Serial Negotiations. If the Contracting Agency is conducting serial negotiations and the Contracting Agency terminates negotiations with an eligible Proposer, the Contracting Agency may then commence negotiations with the next highest scoring eligible Proposer, and continue the sequential process until the Contracting Agency has either:(A)
Determined to Award the Contract to the eligible Proposer with whom it is currently discussing or negotiating; or(B)
Decided to cancel the Procurement under ORS 279B.100 (Cancellation, rejection, delay of invitations for bids or requests for proposals).(d)
Competitive Simultaneous Negotiations. If the Contracting Agency chooses to conduct competitive negotiations, the Contracting Agency may negotiate simultaneously with competing eligible Proposers. The Contracting Agency:(A)
Shall treat all eligible Proposers fairly and shall not favor any eligible Proposer over another;(B)
May disclose other eligible Proposers’ Proposals or the substance of negotiations with other eligible Proposers only if the Contracting Agency notifies all of the eligible Proposers with whom the Contracting Agency will engage in negotiations of the Contracting Agency’s intent to disclose before engaging in negotiations with any eligible Proposer.(e)
Any oral modification of a Proposal resulting from negotiations must be reduced to Writing.(10)
Best and Final Offers. If a Contracting Agency requires best and final Offers, a Contracting Agency must establish a common date and time by which eligible Proposers must submit best and final Offers. If a Contracting Agency is dissatisfied with the best and final Offers, the Contracting Agency may make a written determination that it is in the Contracting Agency’s best interest to conduct additional discussions, negotiations or change the Contracting Agency’s requirements and require another submission of best and final Offers. A Contracting Agency must inform all eligible Proposers that if they do not submit notice of withdrawal or another best and final Offer, their immediately previous Offers will be considered their best and final Offers. The Contracting Agency shall evaluate Offers as modified by the best and final Offers. The Contracting Agency shall conduct the evaluations as described in OAR 137-047-0600 (Offer Evaluation and Award). The Contracting Agency may not modify evaluation factors or their relative importance after the date and time that best and final Offers are due.(11)
Multistep Sealed Proposals. A Contracting Agency may procure Goods or Services by using multistep competitive sealed Proposals under ORS 279B.060 (Competitive sealed proposals)(8)(b)(g). Multistep sealed Proposals is a phased Procurement process that seeks necessary information or unpriced technical Proposals in the first phase and, in the second phase, invites Proposers who submitted technically qualified Proposals to submit competitive sealed price Proposals on the technical Proposals. The Contracting Agency must award the Contract to the Responsible Proposer submitting the most Advantageous Proposal in accordance with the terms of the Solicitation Document applicable to the second phase.(a)
Public Notice. When a Contracting Agency uses multistep sealed Proposals, the Contracting Agency shall give public notice for the first phase in accordance with OAR 137-047-0300 (Public Notice of Solicitation Documents). Public notice is not required for the second phase. However, a Contracting Agency shall give notice of the subsequent phases to all Proposers and inform any Proposers excluded from the second phase of the right, if any, to protest exclusion under OAR 137-047-0720 (Protests and Judicial Review of Multi-Tiered and Multistep Solicitations).(b)
Procedure for Phase One of Multistep Sealed Proposals. A Contracting Agency may initiate a multistep sealed Proposals Procurement by issuing a Request for Proposals in the form and manner required for competitive sealed Proposals except as provided in this rule. In addition to the requirements required for competitive sealed Proposals, the multistep Request for Proposals must state:(A)
That unpriced technical Proposals are requested;(B)
That the solicitation is a multistep sealed Proposal Procurement and that, in the second phase, priced Proposals will be accepted only from those Proposers whose unpriced technical Proposals are found qualified in the first phase;(C)
The criteria for the evaluation of unpriced technical Proposals; and(D)
That the Goods or Services being procured shall be furnished generally in accordance with the Proposer’s technical Proposal as found to be finally qualified and shall meet the requirements of the Request for Proposals.(c)
Addenda to the Request for Proposals. After receipt of unpriced technical Proposals, Addenda to the Request for Proposals shall be distributed only to Proposers who submitted unpriced technical Proposals.(d)
Receipt and Handling of Unpriced Technical Proposals. Unpriced technical Proposals need not be opened publicly.(e)
Evaluation of Unpriced Technical Proposals. Unpriced technical Proposals shall be evaluated solely in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Request for Proposals.(f)
Discussion of Unpriced Technical Proposals. The Contracting Agency may seek clarification of a technical Proposal of any Proposer who submits a qualified, or potentially qualified technical Proposal. During the course of such discussions, the Contracting Agency shall not disclose any information derived from one unpriced technical Proposal to any other Proposer.(g)
Methods of Contractor Selection for Phase One. In conducting phase one, a Contracting Agency may employ any combination of the methods of Contractor selection that call for the establishment of a Competitive Range or include discussions, negotiations, or best and final Offers as set forth in this rule.(h)
Procedure for Phase Two. On the completion of phase one, the Contracting Agency shall invite each qualified Proposer to submit price Proposals. A Contracting Agency shall conduct phase two as any other competitive sealed Proposal Procurement except as set forth in this rule.(j)
No public notice need be given of the request to submit price Proposals because such notice was previously given.
Source:
Rule 137-047-0261 — Multi-tiered and Multistep Proposals, https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/view.action?ruleNumber=137-047-0261.