Treble damages for injury to or removal of produce, trees or shrubs
- costs and attorney fees
- limitation on liability of contract logger
Amended by SB 1501
Effective since March 17, 2022
Relating to a negotiated agreement concerning private forestland; creating new provisions; amending ORS 105.810, 195.308, 496.252, 496.254, 527.620, 527.630, 527.680, 527.685, 527.714, 527.990, 527.992, 610.060 and 610.105; and declaring an emergency.
Source:
Section 105.810 — Treble damages for injury to or removal of produce, trees or shrubs; costs and attorney fees; limitation on liability of contract logger, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors105.html
.
Notes of Decisions
In general
This section does not apply to injuries to fruit crops and trees caused by fumes emitted from defendant’s aluminum plant. Meyer v. Harvey Alum., 263 Or 487, 501 P2d 795 (1972)
Where defendant log hauler did not enter, hire others to enter or act in concert with those entering plaintiff’s land, defendant was not liable for timber trespass. Bergman v. Holden, 118 Or App 530, 848 P2d 141 (1993), as modified by 122 Or App 257, 857 P2d 217 (1993)
Attorney fees are available in action based on conduct occurring prior to effective date of 1995 amendments permitting attorney fees. Vloedman v. Cornell, 161 Or App 396, 984 P2d 906 (1999)
Court may not award attorney fees for claim that presents facts that constitute functional equivalent of timber trespass if pleading does not claim that defendant committed timber trespass. Olson v. Howard, 237 Or App 256, 239 P3d 510 (2010)
Person willfully injuring or severing produce or timber without authorization commits violation, even if person is lawfully present on land. Simington Gardens, LLC v. Rock Ridge Farms, LLC, 308 Or App 661, 481 P3d 396 (2021)
Willful trespass
Punitive damages are not recoverable in action for timber trespass under this section because statutory provision for treble damages is exclusive punitive remedy. Harris v. Wright, 81 Or App 126, 724 P2d 875 (1986)
Where defendant entered plaintiffs’ property and harvested timber, relying on timber deed which defendant executed with plaintiffs’ vendees, and timber deed was invalid because land sale contract under which vendees acquired land unambiguously provided vendees could not transfer interest in realty without plaintiffs’ consent, which was never given, holding that defendant had trespassed as matter of law was not error. Gerdes v. Bohemia, Inc., 88 Or App 62, 744 P2d 275 (1987)
In damage action for timber trespass, it was not error to deny plaintiffs’ claim for costs of reforestation because plaintiffs failed to prove it necessary. Gerdes v. Bohemia, Inc., 88 Or App 62, 744 P2d 275 (1987)
In action for timber trespass it was error to assess value of trees and road built by defendant as mitigating factors; both were relevant to value of property before and after logging and should have been deducted from stumpage value before amount was trebled as damages under this section. Gerdes v. Bohemia Inc., 88 Or App 62, 744 P2d 275 (1987)
Law Review Citations
36 WLR 401 (2000)