Unemployment
- rules
Source:
Section 657.100 — Unemployment; rules, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors657.html.
Notes of Decisions
Since claimant performed services for the corporate employer during the period in question and was compensated for them by the corporation he was not unemployed. Anttonen v. Morgan, 9 Or App 169, 496 P2d 733 (1972)
The test of whether a teacher was unemployed within the meaning of the Oregon unemployment compensation law was not when his teaching and research duties ended but rather the terms of his employment contract with reference to when he would cease receiving remuneration from his former employer for services performed. Gollender v. Morgan, 17 Or App 104, 520 P2d 453 (1974)
Sole owner-employees of income tax preparation corporation were “unemployed” under this section where they were not paid for services, such as checking and answering mail, performed during periods in question. Sullivan v. Employment Division, 42 Or App 581, 600 P2d 965 (1979)
Where reserved vacation pay was earned and payable with respect to earlier weeks of service, and not with respect to weeks for which benefits were claimed, vacation pay was not remuneration payable for services performed during claim weeks. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment Division, 77 Or App 148, 712 P2d 154 (1985), aff’d 302 Or 186, 728 P2d 26 (1986)
Employment Appeals Board incorrectly determined that claimant was not unemployed for purposes of this section when purported “employing unit” was corporation that was nothing more than shell, without place of business, without officers or other employees, without assets, and when claimant performed activities without salary or other expectation of direct reimbursement for his efforts on behalf of corporation. Waltuck v. Employment Div., 105 Or App 542, 805 P2d 739 (1991)
Up to date