Repayment or deduction of benefits paid due to misrepresentation by recipient
- director discretion
- penalty for fraud
- time limits on collection
- civil action by director
- disposition of amounts collected
- rules
Source:
Section 657.310 — Repayment or deduction of benefits paid due to misrepresentation by recipient; director discretion; penalty for fraud; time limits on collection; civil action by director; disposition of amounts collected; rules, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors657.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Where weekly claim forms provided by Employment Division asked claimant to report income-producing work done during reporting period, claimant did not make material misrepresentation in not reporting assisting wife on farm, because he received no remuneration. Shaffer v. Employment Division, 33 Or App 537, 577 P2d 85 (1978)
There was substantial evidence to support finding that petitioner was not unemployed during weeks in question and, under this section, he was required to repay benefits received even though he claimed compensation received was for his son’s benefit. Cook v. Employment Div., 47 Or App 437, 614 P2d 1193 (1980), Sup Ct review denied
Restitution is criminal sanction and not intended to be equivalent of civil award and, although defendant satisfied restitution ordered as part of sentence on conviction for theft involving unlawful obtainment of unemployment benefits, that determination did not collaterally estop plaintiff, administrator of Employment Division, from bringing civil action for recovery of unlawfully obtained benefits because issue resolved in criminal case was not same as issue to be resolved in civil case. Thorne v. Gay, 92 Or App 251, 758 P2d 380 (1988)
Decision regarding liability for overpayment “has become final” for purposes of allowing Employment Department to seek repayment notwithstanding that ruling regarding existence of misrepresentation is on appeal. Employment Dept. v. Clark, 187 Or App 431, 67 P3d 991 (2003)