Transactions exempt from registration
Source:
Section 59.035 — Transactions exempt from registration, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors059.html
.
Notes of Decisions
This exemption provision relates only to the registration requirements and does not exempt any security transaction from the fraud provisions of ORS 59.135. Chester v. McDaniel, 264 Or 303, 504 P2d 726 (1972)
When checks were drawn on corporate account for purchase of supplies, later sale of securities was not made “before the commencement of any business activity.” Day v. Saunders, 270 Or 432, 528 P2d 513 (1974)
When several defendants purchased securities at same time as plaintiff sale did not qualify as “isolated transaction.” Day v. Saunders, 270 Or 432, 528 P2d 513 (1974)
Whether sales to different persons are repeated and successive transactions depends on whether transactions are made within reasonable time period as to indicate that one general purpose actuates vendor and that sales promote same aim and are not so detached and separate as to form no part of single plan. Marshall v. Harris, 276 Or 447, 555 P2d 756 (1976)
Solicitation of transaction by purchaser does not exempt transaction from securities registration requirement. Marshall v. Harris, 276 Or 447, 555 P2d 756 (1976)
Evidence, inter alia, that brokerage firm did not inform investor that securities were being sold by “insiders” of failing corporation, and that investor suffered loss, was sufficient to show that sale price was not “reasonably related” to market price within meaning of this section. Lewelling v. First California Co., 564 F2d 1277 (1977)
Sale of unregistered security, made in context of two other solicitations of offers in Oregon, was not isolated transaction which, under this section, was exempt from registration requirement. Redhouse v. Preferred Properties, 87 Or App 673, 743 P2d 1125 (1987)
Law Review Citations
55 OLR 43-47 (1976); 68 OLR 921 (1989)