Subdivisions and Partitions

ORS 92.040
Application for approval of subdivision or partition

  • tentative plan
  • applicability of local government laws


(1)

Before a plat of any subdivision or partition subject to review under ORS 92.044 (Adoption of standards and procedures governing approval of plats and plans) may be made and recorded, the person proposing the subdivision or partition or authorized agent or representative of the person shall make an application in writing to the county or city having jurisdiction under ORS 92.042 (Governing body having jurisdiction to approve plans, maps or plats) for approval of the proposed subdivision or partition in accordance with procedures established by the applicable ordinance or regulation adopted under ORS 92.044 (Adoption of standards and procedures governing approval of plats and plans). Each such application shall be accompanied by a tentative plan showing the general design of the proposed subdivision or partition. No plat for any proposed subdivision or partition may be considered for approval by a city or county until the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision or partition has been approved by the city or county. Approval of the tentative plan shall not constitute final acceptance of the plat of the proposed subdivision or partition for recording. However, approval by a city or county of such tentative plan shall be binding upon the city or county for the purposes of the preparation of the subdivision or partition plat, and the city or county may require only such changes in the subdivision or partition plat as are necessary for compliance with the terms of its approval of the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision or partition.

(2)

After September 9, 1995, when a local government makes a decision on a land use application for a subdivision inside an urban growth boundary, only those local government laws implemented under an acknowledged comprehensive plan that are in effect at the time of application shall govern subsequent construction on the property unless the applicant elects otherwise.

(3)

A local government may establish a time period during which decisions on land use applications under subsection (2) of this section apply. However, in no event shall the time period exceed 10 years, whether or not a time period is established by the local government. [Amended by 1955 c.756 §7; 1973 c.696 §7; 1983 c.826 §8; 1989 c.772 §5; 1995 c.812 §9; 2005 c.22 §71]
Note: Sections 1 and 2, chapter 442, Oregon Laws 2013, provide:
Sec. 1. When the owner of property that is located in a city in Wasco County with a population greater than 5,000 and that is zoned for residential use files an application for a partition, as defined in ORS 92.010 (Definitions for ORS 92.010 to 92.192), or a subsequent application for a permit in furtherance of the partition, for the property, the city may not, as a condition of approval of the application:

(1)

Assess:

(a)

A charge in lieu of forming a local improvement district; or

(b)

A prepayment against an assessment for a future local improvement district; or

(2)

Require the owner of the property to enter into a nonremonstrance agreement with respect to the future formation of a local improvement district. [2013 c.442 §1]
Sec. 2. Section 1 of this 2013 Act is repealed on July 1, 2023. [2013 c.442 §2]

Notes of Decisions

Board of county commissioners' denial of tentative approval of proposed subdivision plat failed to meet requirements of ORS 215.416 where denial was couched in general language and failed to specify what criteria were used to determine that proposed plat did not comply with county comprehensive plan. Commonwealth Properties v. Washington County, 35 Or App 387, 582 P2d 1384 (1978)

Where development of subdivision property depends on approval of construction on rights-of-way and roadways located adjacent to subdivision lots, applicable local government laws are those that are in effect at time of application to construct subdivision. Athletic Club of Bend, Inc. v. City of Bend, 239 Or App 89, 243 P3d 824 (2010)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Effect of county zoning ordinances on approved subdivision plat, (1973) Vol 36, p 702

§§ 92.010 to 92.190

Notes of Decisions

Due process standards applicable to land use decisions apply to administration of subdivision ordinance. Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761, 566 P2d 904 (1977), Sup Ct review denied

Due process requirements for granting of variances are identical regardless of whether variance is area variance or use variance. Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761, 566 P2d 904 (1977), Sup Ct review denied

Approval of tentative plan under subdivision ordinance is final order reviewable in writ of review proceeding. Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761, 566 P2d 904 (1977), Sup Ct review denied

Modification of sought-after approval of tentative plan must be treated same procedurally as initial application. Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761, 566 P2d 904 (1977), Sup Ct review denied

Owner of parcel unlawfully conveyed without having been partitioned could not unilaterally seek to partition parcel from remainder of original property remaining in separate ownership. Kilian v. City of West Linn, 88 Or App 242, 744 P2d 1314 (1987)

Under statutes in effect in 1981, partitioning of land parcel had effect of vacating previous lot lines unless partition map indicates continued existence of partitioned lots. Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Co. v. Polk County, 246 Or App 548, 267 P3d 855 (2011)

Law Review Citations

10 WLJ 398, 399 (1974)

Chapter 92

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Standards county may impose for approval of private roads created in partitioning land, (1972) Vol 35, p 1230; effect of county zoning ordinances on approved subdivision plat, (1973) Vol 36, p 702; application of Fasano v. Bd. of County Commrs., decision, (1974) Vol 36, p 960

Law Review Citations

10 WLJ 394-403 (1974)


Source

Last accessed
Jun. 26, 2021