Marital Dissolution, Annulment and Separation
Definitions for ORS 107.700 to 107.735
Notes of Decisions
Definition for "interfere" suggests behavior that constitutes direct interference with person protected by Family Abuse Prevention Act order. State v. Trivitt, 247 Or App 199, 268 P3d 765 (2011)
"Interference" as defined in Family Abuse Prevention Act requires direct physical or verbal contact with petitioner; sending email to petitioner's employer did not constitute interference. State v. Balero, 287 Or App 678, 402 P3d 739 (2017)
Law Review Citations
35 WLR 643 (1999)
Notes of Decisions
Criminal contempt proceeding for failure to obey restraining order issued pursuant to Family Abuse Prevention Act is not "criminal prosecution" within meaning of Article I, section 11 of Oregon Constitution. State ex rel Hathaway v. Hart, 70 Or App 541, 690 P2d 514 (1984), aff'd 300 Or 231, 708 P2d 1137 (1985); Bachman v. Bachman, 171 Or App 665, 16 P3d 1185 (2000), Sup Ct review denied
Existence of restraining order prohibiting petitioner from contacting respondent does not provide grounds for refusing to issue restraining order prohibiting respondent from contacting petitioner. Rosiles-Flores v. Browning, 208 Or App 600, 145 P3d 328 (2006)
Judgment holding individual in contempt of "stay away" portion of restraining order does not constitute violation of protection order under federal Immigration and Nationality Act. Szalai v. Holder, 572 F3d 975 (9th Cir. 2009)
Law Review Citations
33 WLR 971 (1997); 85 OLR 325 (2006)
Notes of Decisions
Trial court has authority to establish liquidated sum as amount owed by spouse under settlement agreement. Horner and Horner, 119 Or App 112, 849 P2d 560 (1993)
Atty. Gen. Opinions
Emergency or necessity as the only grounds for waiver of 90-day period, (1971) Vol 35, p 982
Law Review Citations
55 OLR 267-277 (1976); 27 WLR 51 (1991)