Parole
Active parole and post-prison supervision
- minimum amounts
- extension
Notes of Decisions
Requirement that person remain on parole until expiration of sentence could not constitutionally be imposed retroactively to eliminate opportunity previously available for early discharge from parole. Byrnes v. Board of Parole, 134 Or App 296, 894 P2d 1252 (1995)
Board authority with regard to prisoners sentenced for enumerated sex crimes is term of post-prison supervision, not term of supervised parole. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247, 904 P2d 1071 (1995); Williford v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 254, 904 P2d 1074 (1995), Sup Ct review denied
State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision lacks authority to extend post-prison supervision term beyond term imposed by court. Gaynor v. Board of Parole, 165 Or App 609, 996 P2d 1020 (2000)
Law Review Citations
55 OLR 303-347 (1976)
Notes of Decisions
Under rules of State Board of Parole, board could not in determining history/risk score, consider juvenile adjudications that had been expunged pursuant to [former] ORS 419.800 to 419.839, even if prisoner admits to board that they occurred. West v. Board of Parole, 86 Or App 616, 739 P2d 1096 (1987)
Law Review Citations
53 OLR 32, 67-79 (1973)