ORS 215.422
Review of decision of hearings officer or other authority

  • notice of appeal
  • fees
  • appeal of final decision

(1)

Intentionally left blank —Ed.

(a)

A party aggrieved by the action of a hearings officer or other decision-making authority may appeal the action to the planning commission or county governing body, or both, however the governing body prescribes. The appellate authority on its own motion may review the action. The procedure and type of hearing for such an appeal or review shall be prescribed by the governing body, but shall not require the notice of appeal to be filed within less than seven days after the date the governing body mails or delivers the decision to the parties.

(b)

Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, the governing body may provide that the decision of a hearings officer or other decision-making authority is the final determination of the county.

(c)

The governing body may prescribe, by ordinance or regulation, fees to defray the costs incurred in acting upon an appeal from a hearings officer, planning commission or other designated person. The amount of the fee shall be reasonable and shall be no more than the average cost of such appeals or the actual cost of the appeal, excluding the cost of preparation of a written transcript. The governing body may establish a fee for the preparation of a written transcript. The fee shall be reasonable and shall not exceed the actual cost of preparing the transcript up to $500. In lieu of a transcript prepared by the governing body and the fee therefor, the governing body shall allow any party to an appeal proceeding held on the record to prepare a transcript of relevant portions of the proceedings conducted at a lower level at the party’s own expense. If an appellant prevails at a hearing or on appeal, the transcript fee shall be refunded.

(2)

A party aggrieved by the final determination may have the determination reviewed in the manner provided in ORS 197.830 (Review procedures) to 197.845 (Stay of decision being reviewed).

(3)

No decision or action of a planning commission or county governing body shall be invalid due to ex parte contact or bias resulting from ex parte contact with a member of the decision-making body, if the member of the decision-making body receiving the contact:

(a)

Places on the record the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications concerning the decision or action; and

(b)

Has a public announcement of the content of the communication and of the parties’ right to rebut the substance of the communication made at the first hearing following the communication where action will be considered or taken on the subject to which the communication related.

(4)

A communication between county staff and the planning commission or governing body shall not be considered an ex parte contact for the purposes of subsection (3) of this section.

(5)

Subsection (3) of this section does not apply to ex parte contact with a hearings officer approved under ORS 215.406 (Planning and zoning hearings officers) (1). [1973 c.552 §§17,18; 1977 c.766 §13; 1979 c.772 §11; 1981 c.748 §42; 1983 c.656 §1; 1983 c.827 §21; 1991 c.817 §9]

Source: Section 215.422 — Review of decision of hearings officer or other authority; notice of appeal; fees; appeal of final decision, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors215.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Under this section and ORS 34.040, community organization lacked standing to obtain review under representational theory where it had shown no particular injury to interests of members or itself, except in respect to one member who could not establish injury of some substantial right, nor could organization obtain standing under a de jure theory where organization was an unofficially formed group without defined membership. Clark v. Dagg, 38 Or App 71, 588 P2d 1298 (1979), Sup Ct review denied

County may not limit appeals by narrowing class of parties qualifying as being “aggrieved” by action of hearing officer. Overton v. Benton County, 61 Or App 667, 658 P2d 574 (1983)

Person has standing to appeal to Lane County Board of Commissioners from quasi-judicial land use decision made by county hearings officer where person’s interest in decision was recognized by local land use decision-making body; person asserted position on the merits; and local land use decision-making body reached decision contrary to position asserted by person. Lamb v. Lane County, 70 Or App 364, 689 P2d 1049 (1984)

Remand by Land Use Board of Appeals to county board was appropriate because although opponents had not appealed to LUBA, six asserted errors not decided by county board opponents had not waived undecided issues. Smith v. Douglas County, 308 Or 191, 777 P2d 1377 (1989)

Law Review Citations

54 OLR 396 (1975); 55 OLR 122-140 (1976)

215.010
Definitions
215.020
Authority to establish county planning commissions
215.030
Membership of planning commission
215.042
Planning director
215.044
Solar access ordinances
215.047
Effect of comprehensive plan and land use regulations on solar access ordinances
215.050
Comprehensive planning, zoning and subdivision ordinances
215.060
Procedure for action on plan
215.080
Power to enter upon land
215.090
Information made available to commission
215.100
Cooperation with other agencies
215.110
Recommendations for implementation of comprehensive plan
215.130
Application of ordinances and comprehensive plan
215.135
Expansion of nonconforming school in exclusive farm use zone
215.170
Authority of cities in unincorporated area
215.185
Remedies for unlawful structures or land use
215.190
Violation of ordinances or regulations
215.203
Zoning ordinances establishing exclusive farm use zones
215.209
Department of Land Conservation and Development database
215.211
Agricultural land
215.212
Soils Assessment Fund
215.213
Uses permitted in exclusive farm use zones in counties that adopted marginal lands system prior to 1993
215.215
Reestablishment of nonfarm use
215.218
Certain private hunting preserves not subject to land use approval
215.223
Procedure for adopting zoning ordinances
215.233
Validity of ordinances and development patterns adopted before September 2, 1963
215.236
Nonfarm dwelling in exclusive farm use zone
215.237
Events or activities conducted by winery in exclusive farm use zone or mixed farm and forest zone
215.238
Attorney fees in action for nuisance or trespass relating to agri-tourism event or activity
215.239
Siting of agri-tourism event or activity
215.243
Agricultural land use policy
215.246
Approval of land application of certain substances
215.247
Transport of biosolids to tract of land for application
215.249
Division of land for application of biosolids
215.251
Relationship to other farm uses
215.253
Restrictive local ordinances affecting farm use zones prohibited
215.255
Farm product processing facility
215.262
Legislative findings related to nonfarm dwellings
215.263
Land divisions in exclusive farm use zones
215.265
Land divisions
215.273
Applicability to thermal energy power plant siting determinations
215.274
Associated transmission lines necessary for public service
215.275
Utility facilities necessary for public service
215.276
Required consultation for transmission lines to be located on high-value farmland
215.277
Farmworker housing
215.278
Accessory dwellings for farmworkers
215.279
Farm income standard for dwelling in conjunction with farm use
215.281
Legislative findings related to dwellings in conjunction with commercial dairy farm
215.282
Dwellings in conjunction with commercial dairy farm
215.283
Uses permitted in exclusive farm use zones in nonmarginal lands counties
215.284
Dwelling not in conjunction with farm use
215.291
Alteration, restoration or replacement of lawfully established dwelling
215.293
Dwelling in exclusive farm use or forest zone
215.294
Railroad facilities handling materials regulated under ORS chapter 459 or 466
215.296
Standards for approval of certain uses in exclusive farm use zones
215.297
Verifying continuity for approval of certain uses in exclusive farm use zones
215.298
Mining in exclusive farm use zone
215.299
Policy on mining resource lands
215.301
Blending materials for cement prohibited near vineyards
215.304
Rule adoption
215.306
Conducting filming activities in exclusive farm use zones
215.311
Log truck parking in exclusive farm use zones
215.312
Public safety training facility
215.316
Termination of adoption of marginal lands
215.317
Permitted uses on marginal land
215.327
Divisions of marginal land
215.401
Preapplication process for land use approval of disposal site for composting
215.402
Definitions for ORS 215.402 to 215.438 and 215.700 to 215.780
215.406
Planning and zoning hearings officers
215.412
Adoption of hearing procedure and rules
215.416
Permit application
215.417
Time to act under certain approved permits
215.418
Approval of development on wetlands
215.422
Review of decision of hearings officer or other authority
215.425
Review of decision relating to aggregate resources
215.427
Final action on permit or zone change application
215.429
Mandamus proceeding when county fails to take final action on land use application within specified time
215.431
Plan amendments
215.433
Supplemental application for remaining permitted uses following denial of initial application
215.435
Deadline for final action by county on remand of land use decision
215.437
Mandamus proceeding when county fails to take final action within specified time on remand of land use decision
215.438
Transmission towers
215.439
Solar energy systems in residential or commercial zones
215.441
Use of real property for religious activity
215.445
Use of private property for mobile medical clinic
215.446
Renewable energy facility
215.447
Photovoltaic solar power generation facilities on high-value farmland
215.448
Home occupations
215.449
Farm brewery
215.451
Cider business
215.452
Winery
215.453
Large winery
215.454
Lawful continuation of certain winery-related uses or structures
215.455
Effect of approval of winery on land use laws
215.456
Siting winery as commercial activity in exclusive farm use zone
215.457
Youth camps allowed in forest zones and mixed farm and forest zones
215.459
Private campground in forest zones and mixed farm and forest zones
215.461
Guest ranch
215.462
Limitations on guest ranch
215.495
Accessory dwelling units in rural residential zones
215.501
Conversion of historic homes to accessory dwelling units in rural residential zones
215.503
Legislative act by ordinance
215.513
Forwarding of notice to property purchaser
215.605
Counties authorized to adopt housing codes
215.606
Standards for clustered mailboxes in county roads and rights-of-way
215.615
Application and contents of housing ordinances
215.700
Resource land dwelling policy
215.705
Dwellings in farm or forest zone
215.710
High-value farmland description for ORS 215.705
215.720
Criteria for forestland dwelling under ORS 215.705
215.730
Additional criteria for forestland dwelling under ORS 215.705
215.740
Large tract forestland dwelling
215.750
Alternative forestland dwelling
215.755
Other forestland dwellings
215.757
Accessory dwellings supporting family forestry
215.760
Agricultural buildings on land zoned for forest use or mixed farm and forest use
215.780
Minimum lot or parcel sizes
215.783
Land division to preserve open space or park
215.785
Exception to minimum lot or parcel sizes
215.788
Legislative review of lands zoned for farm and forest use
215.791
Review of nonresource lands for ecological significance
215.794
Review of county rezoning designations
215.799
Location of dwellings on wildlife habitat land
Green check means up to date. Up to date