ORS 31.730
Standards for award of punitive damages

  • required review of award by court
  • additional reduction of award for remedial measures

(1)

Punitive damages are not recoverable in a civil action unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the party against whom punitive damages are sought has acted with malice or has shown a reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and has acted with a conscious indifference to the health, safety and welfare of others.

(2)

If an award of punitive damages is made by a jury, the court shall review the award to determine whether the award is within the range of damages that a rational juror would be entitled to award based on the record as a whole, viewing the statutory and common-law factors that allow an award of punitive damages for the specific type of claim at issue in the proceeding.

(3)

In addition to any reduction that may be made under subsection (2) of this section, upon the motion of a defendant the court may reduce the amount of any judgment requiring the payment of punitive damages entered against the defendant if the defendant establishes that the defendant has taken remedial measures that are reasonable under the circumstances to prevent reoccurrence of the conduct that gave rise to the claim for punitive damages. In reducing awards of punitive damages under the provisions of this subsection, the court shall consider the amount of any previous judgment for punitive damages entered against the same defendant for the same conduct giving rise to a claim for punitive damages. [Formerly 18.537]

Source: Section 31.730 — Standards for award of punitive damages; required review of award by court; additional reduction of award for remedial measures, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors031.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Whether punitive damages are within range awardable by rational juror is not determined by fixed ratio between compensatory damages amount and punitive damages amount. Axen v. American Home Products Corp., 158 Or App 292, 974 P2d 224 (1999), modified 160 Or App 19, 981 P2d 340 (1999), Sup Ct review denied, cert. denied, 528 US 1136

Reduction of punitive damages awarded on common law claim of wrongful discharge violates section 17, Article I, Oregon Constitution. Halbasch v. Med-Data, Inc., 192 FRD 641 (D. Or. 2000)

Power to reduce damages award based on remedial measures taken by defendant is limited to trial court. Groth v. Hyundai Precision and Ind. Co., 209 Or App 781, 149 P3d 333 (2006)

Proof of elevated mens rea required by this provision for award of noneconomic damages does not establish similar requirement for other statutes that provide for award of noneconomic damages. Herring v. American Medical Response Northwest, 255 Or App 315, 297 P3d 9 (2013), Sup Ct review denied

31.150
Special motion to strike 31.152
Time for filing special motion to strike 31.155
Exempt actions 31.180
Certain felonious conduct of plaintiff complete defense in tort actions 31.200
Liability of radio or television station personnel for defamation 31.205
Damages recoverable for defamation by radio, television, motion pictures, newspaper or printed periodical 31.210
When general damages allowed 31.215
Publication of correction or retraction upon demand 31.220
Effect of publication of correction or retraction prior to demand 31.225
Publisher’s defenses and privileges not affected 31.230
Wrongful use of civil proceeding 31.250
Mandatory dispute resolution for certain actions against health practitioners and health care facilities 31.260
Definitions for ORS 31.260 to 31.278 31.262
Notice of adverse health care incident 31.264
Discussion of adverse health care incident 31.266
Discussion communications 31.268
Mediation 31.270
Payment and resolution 31.272
Statute of limitations 31.274
Patient representatives 31.276
Duties of Oregon Patient Safety Commission 31.278
Use of information relating to notice of adverse health care incident 31.280
Task Force on Resolution of Adverse Health Care Incidents 31.300
Pleading requirements for actions against design professionals 31.350
Pleading requirements for actions against real estate licensees 31.360
Proof required for claim of economic damages in action arising from injury caused by dog 31.370
Presumption of absence of negligence if defendant conducts criminal records check through Department of State Police 31.550
“Advance payment” defined 31.555
Effect of advance payment 31.560
Advance payment for death or personal injury not admission of liability 31.565
Advance payment for property damage not admission of liability 31.580
Effect of collateral benefits 31.600
Contributory negligence not bar to recovery 31.605
Special questions to trier of fact 31.610
Liability of defendants several only 31.615
Setoff of damages not allowed 31.620
Doctrines of last clear chance and implied assumption of risk abolished 31.700
Right to include medical expenses paid by parent or conservator in action to recover for damages to child 31.705
Economic and noneconomic damages separately set forth in verdict 31.710
Limitation on award for noneconomic damages in claim for wrongful death 31.715
Limitation on recovery of noneconomic damages arising out of operation of motor vehicle 31.725
Pleading punitive damages 31.730
Standards for award of punitive damages 31.735
Distribution of punitive damages 31.740
When award of punitive damages against health practitioner prohibited 31.760
Evidence of nonuse of safety belt or harness to mitigate damages 31.770
Inadmissibility of calculation of future earning potential based on race or ethnicity 31.800
Right of contribution among joint tortfeasors 31.805
Basis for proportional shares of tortfeasors 31.810
Enforcement of right of contribution 31.815
Covenant not to sue 31.820
Severability 31.825
Assignment of cause of action against insurer 31.980
Action for alienation of affections abolished 31.982
Action for criminal conversation abolished
Green check means up to date. Up to date

Current through early 2024

§ 31.730’s source at oregon​.gov