Evidence of nonuse of safety belt or harness to mitigate damages
Source:
Section 31.760 — Evidence of nonuse of safety belt or harness to mitigate damages, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors031.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Where jury was accurately instructed on differences between alleged comparative fault of leaning forward and seat belt mitigation factor, comparative fault defense that plaintiff was leaning forward in truck cabin at time of collision with defendant’s vehicle did not relate only to nonuse of his seat belt and was not precluded by provision of this section under which nonuse cannot be comparative fault defense. Anderson v. Loomis, 110 Or App 396, 822 P2d 752 (1991)
Where failure to wear seatbelt did not cause accident, express limitation of evidence exception prevented introduction of nonuse to prove cause of injury to rescuer. Rectenwald v. Snider, 134 Or App 250, 894 P2d 1242 (1995), Sup Ct review denied
Law Review Citations
26 WLR 551 (1990); 69 OLR 147 (1990)