ORS 316.118
Pro rata share of S corporation income of nonresident shareholder


(1)

The pro rata share of S corporation income of a nonresident shareholder constitutes income or loss derived from or connected with sources in this state as provided in ORS 316.127 (Income of nonresident from Oregon sources) (5).

(2)

In determining the pro rata share of S corporation income of a nonresident shareholder, there shall be included only that part derived from or connected with sources in this state of the shareholder’s distributive share of items of S corporation income, gain, loss and deduction (or item thereof) entering into the federal adjusted gross income of the shareholder, as such part is determined under rules adopted by the Department of Revenue in accordance with the general rules under ORS 316.127 (Income of nonresident from Oregon sources).

(3)

Any modifications, additions or subtractions to federal taxable income described in this chapter that relates to an item of S corporation income, gain, loss or deduction (or item thereof) shall be made in accordance with the shareholder’s pro rata share, for federal income tax purposes of the item to which the modification, addition or subtraction relates, but limited to the portion of such item derived from or connected with sources in this state.

(4)

A nonresident shareholder’s pro rata share of items of income, gain, loss or deduction (or item thereof) shall be determined under ORS 314.763 (Taxation of shareholder’s income) (1). The character of shareholder items for a nonresident shareholder shall be determined under ORS 314.763 (Taxation of shareholder’s income) (2). [1989 c.625 §52; 1991 c.877 §11]
Chapter 316

Notes of Decisions

Unless the divorce decree specifically designates that payments are for child support, payments will be treated as alimony. Henderson v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 153 (1972)

The goal of this chapter is to incorporate all of the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code; taxable income should be adjusted whenever the result of the adjustment is to give effect to the policies or principles of the federal Internal Revenue Code, even though no express authority for the adjustment is present in the statutes. Christian v. Dept. of Rev., 269 Or 469, 526 P2d 538 (1974); Smith v. Dept. of Rev., 270 Or 456, 528 P2d 73 (1974)

By its enactment of this chapter, the legislature intended to adopt §172 of the federal Internal Revenue Code allowing for the carryback and carryforward of net operating losses. Christian v. Dept. of Rev., 269 Or 469, 526 P2d 538 (1974)

Where plaintiff failed to appeal timely as required by this section, appeal rights were not preserved so that cause could be considered on merits. Dela Rosa v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 201 (1989), aff’d 313 Or 284, 832 P2d 1228 (1992)

Where taxpayers paid foreign income taxes on foreign income and claimed foreign taxes paid as federal tax credit and as state business expense deduction, taxpayers who claim federal foreign tax credit are entitled only to foreign tax deduction provided in ORS 316.690. Whipple v. Dept. of Rev., 309 Or 422, 788 P2d 994 (1990)

For purposes of claim preclusion, all issues regarding taxpayer’s income tax liability for tax year constitute same claim. U.S. Bancorp v. Dept. of Revenue, 15 OTR 13 (1999)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Political contributions as credit against Oregon tax return, (1974) Vol 37, p 159

Law Review Citations

57 OLR 309 (1978); 16 WLR 373 (1979)


Source
Last accessed
May. 15, 2020