ORS 316.693
Subtraction for medical expenses of elderly individuals


(1)

(a) In addition to the other modifications to federal taxable income contained in this chapter, there shall be subtracted from federal taxable income the amount paid for medical care of an individual and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, as described in section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code, if the individual meets the age requirement for the tax year under subsection (2) of this section. The amount subtracted under this section may not exceed:

(A)

$3,600 for a joint return if both spouses meet the age requirement for the tax year under subsection (2) of this section, with no more than $1,800 attributable to the medical care of either spouse;

(B)

$1,800 for a joint return if only one spouse meets the age requirement for the tax year under subsection (2) of this section, with no more than $1,800 attributable to the medical care of that spouse; or

(C)

$1,800 for each individual filing a return who meets the age requirement for the tax year under subsection (2) of this section, with no more than $1,800 attributable to the medical care of that individual.

(b)

The subtraction under this section may not include amounts that have previously been deducted in the calculation of Oregon taxable income.

(2)

The subtraction under this section is available only if the individual has attained the following age before the close of the tax year:

(a)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and before January 1, 2014, an individual must attain 62 years of age before the close of the tax year.

(b)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, and before January 1, 2016, an individual must attain 63 years of age before the close of the tax year.

(c)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2018, an individual must attain 64 years of age before the close of the tax year.

(d)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and before January 1, 2020, an individual must attain 65 years of age before the close of the tax year.

(e)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, an individual must attain 66 years of age before the close of the tax year.

(3)

Notwithstanding the amount calculated under subsection (1) of this section, the maximum amount allowed for a subtraction under this section may not exceed:

(a)

$1,400 per individual, if the federal adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the tax year is $50,000 or more and less than $100,000 for a taxpayer who files a return jointly, as a head of household or as a surviving spouse, or for all other taxpayers, $25,000 or more and less than $50,000.

(b)

$1,000 per individual, if the federal adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the tax year is $100,000 or more but does not exceed $200,000 for a taxpayer who files a return jointly, as a head of household or as a surviving spouse, or for all other taxpayers, $50,000 or more but does not exceed $100,000.

(4)

A subtraction may not be claimed under this section if the federal adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the tax year exceeds:

(a)

$200,000 for joint return filers, a surviving spouse or a head of household; or

(b)

$100,000 for an individual who is not a married individual and is not a surviving spouse, or is a married individual who files a separate return. [2013 s.s. c.5 §4; 2014 c.114 §1]
Chapter 316

Notes of Decisions

Unless the divorce decree specifically designates that payments are for child support, payments will be treated as alimony. Henderson v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 153 (1972)

The goal of this chapter is to incorporate all of the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code; taxable income should be adjusted whenever the result of the adjustment is to give effect to the policies or principles of the federal Internal Revenue Code, even though no express authority for the adjustment is present in the statutes. Christian v. Dept. of Rev., 269 Or 469, 526 P2d 538 (1974); Smith v. Dept. of Rev., 270 Or 456, 528 P2d 73 (1974)

By its enactment of this chapter, the legislature intended to adopt §172 of the federal Internal Revenue Code allowing for the carryback and carryforward of net operating losses. Christian v. Dept. of Rev., 269 Or 469, 526 P2d 538 (1974)

Where plaintiff failed to appeal timely as required by this section, appeal rights were not preserved so that cause could be considered on merits. Dela Rosa v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 201 (1989), aff’d 313 Or 284, 832 P2d 1228 (1992)

Where taxpayers paid foreign income taxes on foreign income and claimed foreign taxes paid as federal tax credit and as state business expense deduction, taxpayers who claim federal foreign tax credit are entitled only to foreign tax deduction provided in ORS 316.690. Whipple v. Dept. of Rev., 309 Or 422, 788 P2d 994 (1990)

For purposes of claim preclusion, all issues regarding taxpayer’s income tax liability for tax year constitute same claim. U.S. Bancorp v. Dept. of Revenue, 15 OTR 13 (1999)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Political contributions as credit against Oregon tax return, (1974) Vol 37, p 159

Law Review Citations

57 OLR 309 (1978); 16 WLR 373 (1979)


Source
Last accessed
May. 15, 2020