Rule 405. Methods of proving character
Source:
Section 40.175 — Rule 405. Methods of proving character, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors040.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Defendant, charged with first degree assault, who testified concerning earlier altercations with victim to show victim’s aggressiveness did not, by testimony of specific instance of peaceful conduct, put his character for peacefulness in issue. State v. Peacock, 75 Or App 217, 706 P2d 982 (1985)
Question “Is there any particular kind of lie which (the victim) has a reputation for telling?” is functional equivalent of asking witness to relate specific instances of conduct as proof of character trait of victim for untruthfulness and is improper under this rule. State v. Marshall, 312 Or 367, 823 P2d 961 (1991)
On cross-examination, reference to specific instance of conduct must be based on reliable evidence but need not be based on admissible evidence. In re Tichenor, 340 Or 108, 129 P3d 690 (2006)
For purposes of referencing specific instance of conduct on cross-examination, concern, suspicion or belief that conduct happened, without explanation or support apart from equivocal act, does not constitute reliable information to support reasonable belief that misconduct occurred. Holbrook v. Amsberry, 289 Or App 226, 410 P3d 289 (2017)
Law Review Citations
78 OLR 315 (1999)