Rule 703. Bases of opinion testimony by experts
Source:
Section 40.415 — Rule 703. Bases of opinion testimony by experts, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors040.html
.
Notes of Decisions
OEC 703 does not permit state’s expert witness on direct examination to reveal to the jury results of excludable blood test in prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants. State v. Knepper, 62 Or App 623, 61 P2d 560 (1983)
Where no witness testified about seeing defendant wearing jacket in co-defendant’s vehicle when victim was killed and facts were made known to expert witness through prosecutor’s hypothetical question, evidence was sufficient to support finding to that effect. State v. Nefstad, 309 Or 523, 789 P2d 1326 (1990)
Error in admitting testimony of police officer, not qualified as expert, regarding speed of vehicles involved in collision, was harmless in light of other evidence. Hays v. Huard, 108 Or App 289, 814 P2d 559 (1991)
Police officer, qualified as expert, could testify based on reconstruction as to speed of vehicle involved in collision although he was not eyewitness to accident. DeFries v. Post 108 Or App 298, 815 P2d 224 (1991)
In forming opinion about why event happened, expert witness may consider testimony of participant in event that describes what happened. Bray v. Pfeifer, 112 Or App 375, 829 P2d 730 (1992), Sup Ct review denied
Law Review Citations
19 WLR 423 (1983); 27 WLR 27 (1991)