Rule 705. Disclosure of fact or data underlying expert opinion
Source:
Section 40.425 — Rule 705. Disclosure of fact or data underlying expert opinion, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors040.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Technician’s certification attesting to accuracy of intoxilyzer machine bears those indicia of reliability traditionally associated with public records and is admissible for that reason and thus this Rule was relevant, if at all, only to extent that despite certificate’s reliability defendant chose to cross-examine technician-expert. State v. Bigej, 77 Or App 18, 711 P2d 189 (1985), Sup Ct review denied
Trial court erred in excluding evidence of Intoxilyzer test when person who administered test was not available to testify as defendant did not have right to cross-examine that person and it was sufficient that state offered testimony of person who had observed test, was licensed to administer test and could testify from personal knowledge whether test administration procedures were followed. State v. McCormack, 92 Or App 84, 756 P2d 1281 (1988), Sup Ct review denied
Law Review Citations
19 WLR 425 (1983); 27 WLR 27 (1991)