Prohibited conduct
Source:
Section 260.715 — Prohibited conduct, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors260.html
.
Notes of Decisions
When defendant chose to file candidate’s statement for Voter’s Pamphlet pursuant to ORS 251.085, its substance was circumscribed by law and statements regarding his educational background were “required under the election laws” within the meaning of this section. State v. Huntley, 82 Or App 350, 728 P2d 868 (1986), Sup Ct review denied
When statement is certified as true, statutory prohibition against making false statement is contemporary variant of perjury and is not unconstitutional under Article I, section 8 of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Huntley, 82 Or App 350, 728 P2d 868 (1986), Sup Ct review denied
It is not grant of unequal privileges or immunities under Article I, section 20 of the Oregon Constitution that prosecutor may choose between charging unsworn falsification (ORS 162.085) and making false statements under this section. State v. Huntley, 82 Or App 350, 728 P2d 868 (1986), Sup Ct review denied
Where defendant posted on online forum advertisement stating defendant would give another person $20 if person brought ballot to defendant and allowed defendant to complete ballot, then person would sign ballot and defendant would submit ballot, defendant’s post was “offer to purchase” as that phrase is used in subsection (9) of this section even though defendant meant post as joke and did not intend to follow through with offer. State v. Hirschman, 279 Or App 338, 379 P3d 616 (2016)