Arraignment and Pretrial Provisions
Definitions for ORS 135.230 to 135.290
See also annotations under ORS 140.010 in permanent edition.
Notes of Decisions
In habeas corpus proceeding, considering seriousness of charges, Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance ([former] ORS 475.992) and Conspiracy to Deliver a Controlled Substance (ORS 161.450 and [former] ORS 475.992), plaintiff's lack of stable employment, personal relationships or strong ties to the community together with his admitted association with drug trafficking, required imposition of security for release. Liberman v. Burks, 293 Or 457, 650 P2d 83 (1982)
In habeas corpus proceeding, where charges against plaintiff were severe and likely to result in significant jail term if conviction resulted and plaintiff's ties to community were minimal and where court determined that plaintiff would be under enormous pressure to flee if released, security amount in excess of $200,000 was not excessive. Gillmore v. Pearce, 302 Or 572, 731 P2d 1039 (1987)
For purposes of determining whether persons are family or household members, "cohabitating" means persons live in same residence in relationship similar to spousal relationship. State ex rel Juvenile Department v. C.M.C., 243 Or App 335, 259 P3d 938 (2011)
Law Review Citations
53 OLR 275, 280, 283, 293-295, 316, 326 (1974)
See also annotations under ORS 135.190 in permanent edition.
Notes of Decisions
Enactment of these sections did not deprive bail bondsmen of their right to engage in the bail bond business, and did not violate the provisions of the Oregon or United States Constitutions. Burton v. Tomlinson, 19 Or App 247, 527 P2d 123 (1974)
The pretrial release provisions of ORS 135.230 to 135.290 do not violate Art. I, §14 of the Oregon Constitution. Burton v. Tomlinson, 19 Or App 247, 527 P2d 123 (1974)
No one may be released from custody without executing and filing release agreement with clerk of court. Knutson v. Cupp, 287 Or 489, 601 P2d 129 (1979)
Atty. Gen. Opinions
Security release deposits as bail, (1979) Vol 40, p 139
Law Review Citations
53 OLR 273-337 (1974); 66 OLR 661 (1987)