Policy statement
Source:
Section 243.656 — Policy statement, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors243.html
.
See also annotations under ORS 243.720 and 342.450 in permanent edition.
Notes of Decisions
There is no constitutional or statutory proscription against agreements to arbitrate disputes over the application of agreed procedures relating to teacher renewal. Central Point Sch. Dist. v. Employment Relations Bd., 27 Or App 285, 555 P2d 1269 (1976), Sup Ct review denied
Employment Relations Board had authority to order signing of new written collective bargaining agreement where executed written document did not reflect parties’ bargained agreement. Gresham Grade Teachers Assoc. v. Gresham Grade School Dist., 52 Or App 881, 630 P2d 1304 (1981)
Statutory purpose to provide uniform basis for employe organizing and bargaining would be subverted by holding that statute authorizing county civil service system supersedes collective bargaining required by this Act. AFSCME v. Clackamas County, 69 Or App 488, 687 P2d 1102 (1984)
Law Review Citations
51 OLR 181 (1971); 68 OLR 134 (1989)