Representation questions
- investigation and hearings on petitions
- certification without election
- rules
- elections
Source:
Section 243.682 — Representation questions; investigation and hearings on petitions; certification without election; rules; elections, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors243.html
.
See also annotations under ORS 342.460 in permanent edition.
Notes of Decisions
Designation by the Public Employe Relations Board of an appropriate bargaining unit is not a “final order” so as to be subject to appeal. Klamath County v. Laborers Intl. Union of No. Am., 21 Or App 281, 534 P2d 1169 (1975)
Employment Relations Board findings, that substitute teachers were paid uniform rate and showed desire for representation and community of interest, provided rational basis for conclusion that they were appropriate bargaining unit. Eugene School District v. Substitute Teacher Organization, 31 Or App 1255, 572 P2d 650 (1977)
Employment Relations Board order under this section, determining that proposed bargaining unit was inappropriate, was not unlawful in procedure or substance in its conclusion as to fragmentation of work force and was supported by evidence. OSEA v. Deschutes County, 40 Or App 371, 595 P2d 501 (1979)
Dictum in previous agency decision did not qualify as officially stated agency position or prior agency practice. Association of Engineering Employes v. Department of Transportation, 72 Or App 371, 695 P2d 961 (1985)
Employment Relations Board preference for certifying largest possible bargaining unit does not deny employees right to choose representative labor organization. University of Oregon Chapter, AFT v. University of Oregon, 92 Or App 614, 759 P2d 1112 (1988)
Under this section, Employment Relations Board must conduct hearing when question of representation exists unless parties expressly consent to election. OACE v. Eagle Point School Dist. No. 9, 99 Or App 347, 782 P2d 432 (1989)
Nothing in this statute precludes Employment Relations Board from conducting election with separate balloting by currently recognized bargaining units. Welches School Dist. v. Welches Education Assn., 116 Or App 564, 842 P2d 437 (1992), Sup Ct review denied
Attorney General Opinions
Insuring dependents of school employes as a subject for board-employe consultation, (1971) Vol 35, p 979
Law Review Citations
51 OLR 181 (1971)