Authorized sanctions
- grounds for imposing sanctions
- civil penalty
Source:
Section 675.070 — Authorized sanctions; grounds for imposing sanctions; civil penalty, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors675.html.
Notes of Decisions
Board of Psychologist Examiners was not required to further define, through rulemaking, ethical standard which petitioner-psychologist was found to have violated through sexual relationships with patients and Board acted within its statutory authority in revoking petitioner’s license to practice. Gilmore v. Board of Psychologist Examiners, 81 Or App 321, 725 P2d 400 (1986), Sup Ct review denied
Even if same facts would support both sanctions, board’s factual findings of unprofessional conduct within an emergency license suspension hearing cannot later support permanent suspension over accused’s request for new hearing. Miller v. Board of Psychologist Examiners, 289 Or App 34, 407 P3d 935 (2017)
Board has discretion to impose penalty up to $10,000 for person practicing psychology without license regardless of amount psychologist was paid for services. Childress v. Board of Psychology, 327 Or App 48, 533 P3d 1099 (2023)
Up to date