Blood or buccal sample and thumbprint of certain convicted defendants required
- application
Amended by HB 4010
Effective since June 6, 2024
Relating to health care; creating new provisions; amending ORS 3.450, 30.302, 30.800, 30.802, 31.260, 31.740, 58.376, 87.555, 87.560, 87.565, 87.575, 87.581, 109.640, 109.650, 109.675, 109.680, 109.685, 124.050, 127.663, 127.700, 135.139, 136.220, 137.076, 137.473, 137.476, 146.181, 146.750, 147.403, 169.076, 169.077, 169.750, 192.547, 192.556, 192.566, 315.616, 336.479, 336.490, 339.870, 343.146, 348.303, 353.450, 408.310, 408.315, 408.340, 410.530, 413.273, 413.574, 413.590, 414.550, 418.747, 418.782, 419B.005, 419B.020, 419B.023, 419B.035, 419B.352, 421.467, 421.590, 430.401, 430.735, 431.180, 431A.570, 432.005, 433.010, 433.017, 433.110, 433.260, 433.443, 433.800, 433.815, 435.205, 435.305, 436.225, 436.235, 436.295, 438.010, 441.064, 441.098, 441.775, 441.776, 442.490, 443.065, 443.075, 443.850, 453.307, 463.015, 475.005, 475.528, 475.744, 475.950, 475.975, 475.976, 475.978, 475C.777, 475C.891, 496.018, 616.750, 628.270, 656.005, 656.245, 656.260, 656.799, 659A.150, 659A.413, 675.755, 676.340, 676.345, 676.347, 676.454, 676.650, 676.860, 677.085, 677.095, 677.097, 677.135, 677.137, 677.139, 677.141, 677.235, 677.494, 677.495, 677.500, 677.505, 677.510, 677.511, 677.512, 677.515, 677.518, 677.520, 677.525, 677.535, 680.205, 680.545, 688.132, 688.405, 688.510, 688.515, 688.525, 688.805, 694.042, 735.631, 742.400, 742.504, 743A.036, 743A.044, 743B.221, 743B.222, 743B.427, 744.364, 744.367, 746.230, 746.600, 750.055, 759.693, 759.698, 807.090, 811.220, 811.604 and 811.611 and section 9, chapter 550, Oregon Laws 2011, section 2, chapter 575, Oregon Laws 2015, section 20, chapter 349, Oregon Laws 2021, and section 9, chapter 629, Oregon Laws 2021; and prescribing an effective date.
Source:
Section 137.076 — Blood or buccal sample and thumbprint of certain convicted defendants required; application, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors137.html (accessed May 26, 2025).
Notes of Decisions
Drawing of blood samples from convicted or adjudicated prisoners for future DNA identification purposes does not constitute unreasonable search or seizure. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Orozco, 129 Or App 148, 878 P2d 432 (1994), Sup Ct review denied; Rise v. State of Oregon, 59 F3d 1556 (9th Cir. 1995)
Application of blood sampling program to persons convicted prior to program creation does not constitute additional punishment. Rise v. State of Oregon, 59 F3d 1556 (9th Cir. 1995)
Required blood testing of all persons convicted of listed felonies does not violate due process. Rise v. State of Oregon, 59 F3d 1556 (9th Cir. 1995)
Requiring convicted felon to supply blood or buccal sample does not violate federal or state constitutional privacy rights. State v. Sanders, 343 Or 35, 163 P3d 607 (2007)