Duty of corrections agencies to impose structured, intermediate sanctions for probation violations
Source:
Section 137.593 — Duty of corrections agencies to impose structured, intermediate sanctions for probation violations, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors137.html
.
Notes of Decisions
Authority of sentencing judge who revokes probation to require period of incarceration not exceeding 180 days for offender sentenced to custody of county supervisory authority does not limit authority of judge to impose sentence of incarceration otherwise allowed by law. State v. Ferguson, 228 Or App 1, 206 P3d 1145 (2009)
As used in this section, terms “structured, intermediate sanction[s]” include only sanctions imposed for violating conditions of probation for particular crime; thus, this section did not prevent trial court from revoking probation on burglary conviction, based on same conduct, when individual already served structured, intermediate sanction imposed for violation of condition of post-prison supervision on theft conviction. State v. Richards, 277 Or App 128, 370 P3d 874 (2016), aff’d 361 Or 840, 401 P3d 767 (2017)
Where court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate probation violation charged during probationary period, court’s authority does not extend to probation violations charged after end of probationary period. State v. Berglund, 311 Or App 424, 491 P3d 820 (2021)